Evaluation of individual criteria for low probability interpretation of ventilation-perfusion lung scans
- PMID: 8691243
Evaluation of individual criteria for low probability interpretation of ventilation-perfusion lung scans
Abstract
The purpose of this investigation was to identify characteristics or combinations of characteristics of the ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scan in patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism (PE) can be used for a "very low probability" interpretation ( < 10% positive predictive value).
Methods: Data were culled from individual lungs of 532 patients in the randomized arm of the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED) study and 205 patients in the referred arm. All patients had a < 20% consensus probability estimate of PE based on V/Q scan results, and all underwent pulmonary angiography.
Results: Nonsegmental perfusion abnormalities, perfusion defects smaller than opacities on the chest radiograph, a combination of these types of perfusion abnormalities, and matched V/Q abnormalities in two or three zones of a single lung had a positive predictive value < 10%. These criteria can therefore be used for a very low probability interpretation. A matched V/Q defect in only one zone of the lung had a positive predictive value greater than 10% and is not a criterion for low probability. Perfusion defects associated with small pleural effusions (obliteration of the costophrenic angle) had a positive predictive value of 25%-33%, depending on the group studied, and are a criterion for intermediate probability.
Conclusion: Criteria appropriate for a very low probability ( < 10% positive predictive value) interpretation of V/Q scans in patients with suspected acute PE have been identified.
Comment in
-
The low probability V/Q lung scan: can its credibility be enhanced?J Nucl Med. 1996 Apr;37(4):582-4. J Nucl Med. 1996. PMID: 8691244 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Pleural effusion and ventilation/perfusion scan interpretation for acute pulmonary embolus.J Nucl Med. 1996 Aug;37(8):1310-3. J Nucl Med. 1996. PMID: 8708762
-
Very low probability interpretation of V/Q lung scans in combination with low probability objective clinical assessment reliably excludes pulmonary embolism: data from PIOPED II.J Nucl Med. 2007 Sep;48(9):1411-5. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.040998. J Nucl Med. 2007. PMID: 17785726
-
Small perfusion defects in suspected pulmonary embolism.J Nucl Med. 1996 Aug;37(8):1313-6. J Nucl Med. 1996. PMID: 8708763 Clinical Trial.
-
Comprehensive analysis of the results of the PIOPED Study. Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis Study.J Nucl Med. 1995 Dec;36(12):2380-7. J Nucl Med. 1995. PMID: 8523135 Review.
-
Review of criteria appropriate for a very low probability of pulmonary embolism on ventilation-perfusion lung scans: a position paper.Radiographics. 2000 Jan-Feb;20(1):99-105. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.20.1.g00ja1399. Radiographics. 2000. PMID: 10682775 Review.
Cited by
-
Diagnosing venous thromboembolism in pregnancy.Br J Radiol. 2016 Jun;89(1062):20160021. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160021. Epub 2016 Apr 8. Br J Radiol. 2016. PMID: 27055494 Free PMC article.
-
Multidetector computed tomographic angiography of the cardiovascular system.Postgrad Med J. 2007 Nov;83(985):698-704. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2007.061804. Postgrad Med J. 2007. PMID: 17989269 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical