Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1996 Jul;24(1):17-22; discussion 22-4.
doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(96)70140-4.

Evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: is duplex ultrasonography sufficient?

Affiliations
Free article
Comparative Study

Evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: is duplex ultrasonography sufficient?

P M Muto et al. J Vasc Surg. 1996 Jul.
Free article

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the results of duplex ultrasonography and magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis to determine whether ultrasonography alone is sufficient for preoperative evaluation.

Methods: This study consisted of a retrospective review of 33 patients who underwent 35 carotid endarterectomies. A total of 66 vessels were studied by both duplex ultrasonography and magnetic resonance angiography, and an overall correlation between the two studies was determined.

Results: A high correlation was found between duplex and magnetic resonance angiography with an r coefficient equal to 0.87 (Pearson's correlation coefficient) and kappa = 0.75. Discrepancies between the two studies or the presence of intracranial disease did not alter surgical decision making.

Conclusion: Duplex ultrasonography alone can accurately determine the degree of internal carotid artery stenosis and when paired with careful clinical evaluation is a reliable and cost-effective method for evaluating surgical carotid disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources