Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1996 Feb;38(2):142-7.
doi: 10.1007/BF00604801.

Two-dimensional MRI at 1.5 and 0.5 T versus CT myelography in the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy

R J Bartlett  1 , C A Hill, R Devlin, E D Gardiner
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Two-dimensional MRI at 1.5 and 0.5 T versus CT myelography in the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy

R J Bartlett et al. Neuroradiology. 1996 Feb.

Abstract

A prospective comparison was made of standard two-dimensional MRI sequences, at both high and midfield strength, with CT myelography in 23 patients with cervical spondylosis. MRI is adequate for assessment of cord compression, where high field strength is superior to midfield strength. MRI using 4-mm sections is inadequate for presurgical assessment of root compression. It remains to be proven whether thin-section white-CSF volume sequences or gadolinium-enhanced volume studies can replace CT myelography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988 Feb;150(2):397-403 - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988 Mar;150(3):683-9 - PubMed
    1. Acta Radiol. 1989 May-Jun;30(3):233-9 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990 Sep;72(8):1178-84 - PubMed
    1. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991 Mar-Apr;12(2):237-41 - PubMed

MeSH terms