[Comparative analysis of sutures and stapling for colorectal anastomosis in resection of the rectum in carcinoma]
- PMID: 8693863
[Comparative analysis of sutures and stapling for colorectal anastomosis in resection of the rectum in carcinoma]
Abstract
In Clinic for general and vascular surgery - Military Medical Academy Belgrade since 1987 to 1993 in treatment of the rectal cancer it was done 326 low anterior resections. In 149 patients anastomosis was done with sutures and in 177 with stapler. Half of them were more then 60 years old, and in 40% of patients carcinoma was staged as Dukes C or D. In group I tumor was localised in the middle or distal third of rectum in 24.8% of patients while in group II this was in 75.7%. Anastomosis related complications where rare in stapler group, clinically evident anastomotic dehiscence was found in 11.4% patients in I group and in 99% in II group. Total mortality was 3.1%; 3.4% in the I group and 2.8% in the II group. In our comparative analysis of early complications after low anterior resection of rectum when colorectal anastomosis was done with suture or stapler technic we have found that stapler technic give opportunity for creating much more low colorectal anastomoses which are safe and with less complications and with the same oncologic control of disease.
Similar articles
-
[Mechanical sutures in resection of the rectum in carcinoma].Acta Chir Iugosl. 1994;41(2 Suppl 2):265-7. Acta Chir Iugosl. 1994. PMID: 8693864 Croatian.
-
[Mechanical versus manual anastomoses in colorectal surgery. Personal experience].G Chir. 2008 Nov-Dec;29(11-12):505-10. G Chir. 2008. PMID: 19068189 Review. Italian.
-
[Manual and mechanic anastomosis. Comparison in oncologic surgery of the colon and rectum].Minerva Chir. 1990 Mar 15;45(5):237-40. Minerva Chir. 1990. PMID: 2198488 Italian.
-
[Comparative analysis of sutured and stapled colorectal anastomoses].Vojnosanit Pregl. 1994 Nov-Dec;51(6):492-5. Vojnosanit Pregl. 1994. PMID: 8585154 Serbian.
-
Stapled anastomoses in colorectal surgery: a prospective study.Eur J Surg. 1996 Oct;162(10):805-10. Eur J Surg. 1996. PMID: 8934111 Review.