Environment of infants during sleep and risk of the sudden infant death syndrome: results of 1993-5 case-control study for confidential inquiry into stillbirths and deaths in infancy. Confidential Enquiry into Stillbirths and Deaths Regional Coordinators and Researchers
- PMID: 8696193
- PMCID: PMC2351639
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.313.7051.191
Environment of infants during sleep and risk of the sudden infant death syndrome: results of 1993-5 case-control study for confidential inquiry into stillbirths and deaths in infancy. Confidential Enquiry into Stillbirths and Deaths Regional Coordinators and Researchers
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the role of sleeping arrangements as risk factors for the sudden infant death syndrome after a national risk reduction campaign.
Design: Two year population based case-control study. Parental interviews were conducted for each infant who died and for four controls matched for age and date of interview.
Setting: Three regions in England with a total population of 17 million people.
Subjects: 195 babies who died and 780 matched controls.
Results: Prone and side sleeping positions both carried increased risks of death compared with supine when adjusted for maternal age, parity, gestation, birth weight, exposure to smoke, and other relevant factors in the sleeping environment (multivariate odds ratio = 9.00 (95% confidence interval 2.84 to 28.47) and 1.84 (1.02 to 3.31), respectively). The higher incidence of side rather than prone sleeping led to a higher population attributable risk (side 18.4%, prone 14.2%). More of the infants who died were found with bed covers over their heads (21.58; 6.21 to 74.99). The use of a dummy had an apparent protective effect (0.38; 0.21 to 0.70). Bed sharing for the whole night was a significant risk factor for infants whose mothers smoked (9.25; 2.31 to 34.02). No protective effect of breast feeding could be identified on multivariate analysis.
Conclusions: This study confirms the importance of certain risk factors for the sudden infant death syndrome and identifies others-for example, covers over the head, side sleeping position-which may be amenable to change by educating and informing parents and health care professionals.
Comment in
-
Sudden infant death syndrome: after the "back to sleep" campaign.BMJ. 1996 Jul 27;313(7051):180-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7051.180. BMJ. 1996. PMID: 8696178 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
BMJ's embargo should not be broken.BMJ. 1996 Aug 3;313(7052):305. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7052.305c. BMJ. 1996. PMID: 8704575 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Sudden infant death syndrome. More attention should have been paid to socioeconomic factors.BMJ. 1996 Nov 23;313(7068):1332. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7068.1332. BMJ. 1996. PMID: 8942708 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Sudden infant death syndrome. Smoking is part of a causal chain.BMJ. 1996 Nov 23;313(7068):1332-3; author reply 1333-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7068.1332a. BMJ. 1996. PMID: 8942709 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Sudden infant death syndrome. Many infants move from position in which they are put to sleep.BMJ. 1996 Nov 23;313(7068):1333; author reply 1333-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7068.1333. BMJ. 1996. PMID: 8942710 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical