Similar articles

• Cholangiopancreatoscopy: risks and benefits.

  Mosler P. Mosler P. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Feb;73(2):257-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.10.007. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011. PMID: 21295638 No abstract available.
• The Charleston MRCP experience: a tiny step in the right direction.

  Adamek HE, Riemann JF. Adamek HE, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Jul;96(7):1959-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03962.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001. PMID: 11467619 No abstract available.
• Technology assessment status evaluation: biliary and pancreatic sampling devices during ERCP. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

  [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Gastroenterol Nurs. 1998 Sep-Oct;21(5):222-4. Gastroenterol Nurs. 1998. PMID: 9830967 Review. No abstract available.
• Pancreatic endoscopy.

  Kozarek RA. Kozarek RA. Endoscopy. 2008 Jan;40(1):55-60. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-967043. Endoscopy. 2008. PMID: 18210341 Review. No abstract available.
• Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a new technique for evaluating the biliary tract and pancreatic duct.

  Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Zfass AM. Fulcher AS, et al. Gastroenterologist. 1998 Mar;6(1):82-7. Gastroenterologist. 1998. PMID: 9531120