Clinical toxicity and laboratory effects of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) mobilization and blood stem cell apheresis from normal donors, and analysis of charges for the procedures
- PMID: 8701453
- DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1996.36796323057.x
Clinical toxicity and laboratory effects of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) mobilization and blood stem cell apheresis from normal donors, and analysis of charges for the procedures
Erratum in
- Transfusion 1997 Jan;37(1):109
Abstract
Background: Apheresis of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim)-mobilized blood stem cells from normal donors is now being used in place of a marrow harvest in transplantation. How the adverse effects of and charges for this procedure compare with those of the standard marrow harvest is not known.
Study design and methods: Forty consecutive normal subjects who received filgrastim 96 micrograms/kg) subcutaneously twice daily for 4 to 6 days in preparation for apheresis were monitored prospectively by clinical and laboratory evaluation.
Results: Sixty-two percent of the subjects required oral analgesics. None discontinued filgrastim prematurely. Bone pain (82%), headache (70%), fatigue (20%), and nausea (10%) were reported. Filgrastim caused a mean eightfold increase in neutrophil counts, a mean twofold increase in lymphocyte counts, a mean twofold rise in alkaline phosphatase and lactate dehydrogenase levels, and minor changes in serum potassium, magnesium, and uric acid. Adverse events and laboratory effects resolved within 7 days after apheresis. No apheresis stem cell donor required transfusion or hospitalization, and only one required an additional clinic visit after completion of apheresis. By comparison, a retrospective analysis of 33 normal marrow donors demonstrated that all received transfusion(s), 3 were hospitalized, 3 required additional clinic visits after the marrow harvest. The median total charges related to the two procedures were comparable (p = 0.43), although the charges were significantly lower for donors requiring only one apheresis procedure (p = 0.002).
Conclusion: Filgrastim mobilization and apheresis of blood stem cells constitute a safe, well-tolerated, and comparable or less expensive alternative to the traditional marrow harvest.
Comment in
-
Allogeneic marrow reconstitution using peripheral blood stem cells: the dawn of a new era.Transfusion. 1996 Jul;36(7):585-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1996.36796323056.x. Transfusion. 1996. PMID: 8701452 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
