Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1990;37(2):239-49.

[Splenorrhaphy and partial splenectomy as an alternative to splenectomy in trauma--overview]

[Article in Croatian]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 8701680
Review

[Splenorrhaphy and partial splenectomy as an alternative to splenectomy in trauma--overview]

[Article in Croatian]
V Radonić et al. Acta Chir Iugosl. 1990.

Abstract

For many year splenectomy was considered to be the only possible surgical treatment for all laceration of the spleen, whether resulting from abdominal contusion or not. Such factors have led to changes in practical attitudes to splenic lacerations but it would seem that indications for a conservative approach must be based upon the underlaying condition and the precise nature of the lesions. Splenectomy should be done promptly in cases of concomitant splenic and cerebral injury and in patients with injury of multiple organ systems. Present knowledge of the complications of anesplenia has led to new surgical techniques for conservation of splenic tissue. Splenorrhaphy was a frequently used treatment in the non-complicated traumatic lesions. The decision of whether or not to remove an injured spleen is one which must be made intraoperatively by the surgeon. Operative splenic repair and preservation of the spleen often requires considerable experience. We conclude that surgical splenic preservation is a viable and safe procedure, especially in infants and young children.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles