Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1996 Sep;10(9):904-8.
doi: 10.1007/BF00188480.

Laparoscopic rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse. Clinical outcome and anorectal function tests

Affiliations

Laparoscopic rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse. Clinical outcome and anorectal function tests

A C Poen et al. Surg Endosc. 1996 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of laparoscopic rectopexy and its effect on anorectal function investigations.

Methods: Twelve patients with complete rectal prolapse without constipation underwent laparoscopic rectopexy. Pre- and postoperative evaluation included scoring of incontinence, anorectal manometry, and anal endosonography.

Results: No recurrences of rectal prolapse were seen (median follow-up 19 months). Continence improved in eight of nine preoperatively incontinent patients. Two patients had mild constipation after surgery. Median maximum basal pressure measured by anorectal manometry increased from 20 to 25 mmHg (p = 0.005) and the rectoanal inhibitory reflex improved in seven patients (p = 0.03). Rectal sensitivity did not change significantly. Endosonography showed asymmetry and thickening of the internal anal sphincter and submucosa preoperatively. After surgery the maximum internal anal sphincter thickness decreased from 3.0 mm to 2.6 mm (p = 0.02).

Conclusions: Laparoscopic rectopexy improved continence in our patients. Anorectal function tests show a partial recovery of the internal anal sphincter. Laparoscopic rectopexy combines the low morbidity of minimal invasive surgery with the good outcome of abdominal rectopexy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Br J Surg. 1991 Aug;78(8):921-3 - PubMed
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994 Aug;37(8):805-13 - PubMed
    1. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1993 Dec;3(6):456-8 - PubMed
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992 Jan;35(1):59-63 - PubMed
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992 Jul;35(7):689-93 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources