Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1996 Apr;80(4):346-9.
doi: 10.1136/bjo.80.4.346.

Primary vitrectomy for pseudophakic retinal detachment

Affiliations

Primary vitrectomy for pseudophakic retinal detachment

K U Bartz-Schmidt et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996 Apr.

Abstract

Aim/background: Viewing the peripheral retina is the major problem in the repair of pseudophakic retinal detachments. Conventional buckling procedures in pseudophakic eyes are complicated by persistent retinal (re-) detachment and proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) more often than in phakic eyes.

Methods: Primary vitrectomy was performed in 33 consecutive cases for pseudophakic retinal detachment with the help of liquid perfluorocarbons and a wide angle viewing system, following a standardised procedure. All eyes have passed the 12 month follow up examination.

Results: The primary reattachment rate was 94%. PVR was observed in one case (3%). Seventy nine per cent (26 eyes) regained vision of 20/50 or better, with a median visual acuity of 20/30. The most frequent complication was transient glaucoma during the early postoperative period in 48% (16 eyes) requiring carboanhydrase inhibitors.

Conclusion: The main advantage of primary vitrectomy over conventional buckling seems to be the better intraoperative sight to the most peripheral retinal holes, controlled removal of vitreous traction, and focused endolaser coagulation. This may explain the low rate of PVR after primary vitrectomy. Also, visual results tended to be better compared with conventional surgical techniques possibly because of removed vitreous opacities, and because of a superior retinal reattachment rate as well as the reduced rate of PVR.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1971 May;85(5):565-9 - PubMed
    1. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991 Aug 15;112(2):159-65 - PubMed
    1. Invest Ophthalmol. 1974 Nov;13(11):863-8 - PubMed
    1. Ophthalmology. 1981 May;88(5):447-54 - PubMed
    1. Ophthalmology. 1983 May;90(5):546-51 - PubMed