Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1996 Apr;26(4):379-90.

[Propafenone and sotalol: long-term efficacy and tolerability in the prevention of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. A placebo-controlled double-blind study]

[Article in Italian]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 8707022
Clinical Trial

[Propafenone and sotalol: long-term efficacy and tolerability in the prevention of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. A placebo-controlled double-blind study]

[Article in Italian]
F Bellandi et al. G Ital Cardiol. 1996 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation is a relatively frequent atrial arrhythmias activated with increased morbidity and mortality.

Methods: To assess the propafenone and sotalol efficacy in the prevention of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (FA) we enrolled, in a double blind placebo controlled study over 1 year, 300 patients (168 males); mean age 52.3 +/- 17.2 years, randomized to receive orally, three times daily, either propafenone (mean daily dose of 13 +/- 1.5 mg/Kg; Group A: 102 patients) or sotalol (mean daily dose of 3 +/- 0.4 mg/Kg; Group B: 106 patients) or placebo (Group C: 92 patients). All subjects experienced in previous 12 months at least 4 FA episodes. During follow-up we considered atrial tachyarrhythmia (TAA) onset: FA recurrences and/or the onset of atrial flutter (FIA). Three patients (3%) of Group A and 5 (5%) of Group B interrupted therapy for side effects; 5 patients (5.5%) of Group C with supraventricular tachycardia interrupted the double blind therapy; 11 were lost to follow-up.

Results: Of the remaining 276 patients, TAA were observed in 43 (44.8%) of 96 patients in Group A, 28 (29.5%) of 95 patients in Group B and 62 (72.9%) of 85 patients in Group C. TAA were significantly less in A and B groups than in Group C (p < 0.005); a significant TAA reduction was also observed in patients treated with sotalol compared with those treated with propafenone (p < 0.05). TAA were: FA-118 (88.7%) and FIA-15 (11.3%). The arrhythmia free time was significantly shorter in Group C.

Conclusions: Sotalol seems to be more effective than propafenone and therefore represents a valid alternative for FA prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources