Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1996 Feb;60(2):152-7.
doi: 10.1136/jnnp.60.2.152.

Observer variation in the interpretation of intra-arterial angiograms and the risk of inappropriate decisions about carotid endarterectomy

Affiliations

Observer variation in the interpretation of intra-arterial angiograms and the risk of inappropriate decisions about carotid endarterectomy

G R Young et al. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To determine how often observer variation in the interpretation of intra-arterial angiograms might alter the decision whether or not to refer patients for carotid surgery.

Methods: A prospective study was carried out in a consecutive series of 99 patients with transient ischaemic attacks and minor strokes. Interpretable angiographic films were available for 179 carotid artery bifurcations. Stenosis of the internal carotid artery was measured using mm scales, independently by three different radiologists (A, B, and C), using the European Carotid Surgery Trial method.

Results: An analysis of the grouped data showed good to moderate agreement by kappa statistics for radiologists A v B, B v C, and A v C of 0.68, 0.60, and 0.70 respectively. The mean absolute difference in the estimate of stenosis by each of the different radiologists (interobserver variation) was 9.5% and for each radiologist on two separate occasions (intraobserver variation) 8.4%. The degree of observer error was smallest among severely stenosed arteries. Although the absolute differences were small, "clinically important" differences which could change the treatment recommended from surgery to no surgery (or vice versa) occurred between radiologists A and B, B and C, and A and C in: seven (3.9%), six (3.4%), and 11 (6.1%) vessels respectively.

Conclusions: Because observer variation affects all of the imaging methods (Doppler, duplex, contrast arteriography, and MR angiography) used to select patients with transient ischaemic attack and stroke, these findings are likely to be widely relevant. Any centre assessing patients with cerebrovascular disease will need to implement strict quality control measures in the interpretation of angiograms (and other vascular imaging procedures) to minimise observer error and thereby reduce the number of inappropriate decisions made to refer for carotid artery surgery or not.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74 - PubMed
    1. Stroke. 1983 Nov-Dec;14(6):885-92 - PubMed
    1. Surgery. 1984 Nov;96(5):909-18 - PubMed
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Aug;126(2):161-9 - PubMed
    1. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993 Sep;56(9):967-72 - PubMed

Publication types