Pleural effusion and ventilation/perfusion scan interpretation for acute pulmonary embolus
- PMID: 8708762
Pleural effusion and ventilation/perfusion scan interpretation for acute pulmonary embolus
Abstract
This study was conducted to determine if pleural effusion size affects ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scan interpretation algorithms for acute pulmonary embolus (PE).
Methods: Retrospective analysis identified 163 consecutive patients undergoing angiography for PE with radiographic evidence for pleural effusion. V/Q scanning was performed in 94 (58%) of cases and reported using original Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED) criteria. Effusions were classified as small, large and/or bilateral. Radiographic and scintigraphic results were compared with regard to size and location of abnormalities.
Results: Of the 163 patients, 57 (35%) had angiographically-proven PE, 77 (47%) had at least one large pleural effusion and 86 (53%) had a small effusion; 33 (43%) with large effusions and 24 (28%) with small effusions had emboli at angiography. Thirty-six of 119 patients (30%) with clear chest radiographs (a control group) had PE. Thus, large effusions were associated with a higher incidence of PE than those with small effusions or clear lungs (p < 0.05). Of those with V/Q scanning, 26 of 94 (28%) had a solitary large effusion, with 12 (46%) positive for emboli. V/Q-matched abnormalities limited to effusion size were found in 16 with a solitary large effusion and 10 with a solitary small effusion. In both groups, 50% were angiographically positive for emboli. Twenty-three (66%) of 35 with bilateral effusions had corresponding V/Q-matched defects at one (n = 11) or both (n = 12) lung bases, and 9 (39%) were positive for emboli. In total, 45% with a V/Q-matched defect of equivalent size to the effusion were angiographically positive for PE.
Conclusion: Pulmonary emboli are associated with pleural effusions of all sizes. Matched V/Q defects corresponding to radiographically-evident pleural effusions are of intermediate probability for PE. Thus, revision of the traditional lung scan interpretive criteria based upon pleural effusion size is not warranted.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of individual criteria for low probability interpretation of ventilation-perfusion lung scans.J Nucl Med. 1996 Apr;37(4):577-81. J Nucl Med. 1996. PMID: 8691243
-
Matched ventilation, perfusion and chest radiographic abnormalities in acute pulmonary embolism.J Nucl Med. 1996 Oct;37(10):1636-8. J Nucl Med. 1996. PMID: 8862298 Clinical Trial.
-
Lung scan perfusion defects limited to matching pleural effusions: low probability of pulmonary embolism.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985 Dec;145(6):1155-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.145.6.1155. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985. PMID: 3877417
-
Comprehensive analysis of the results of the PIOPED Study. Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis Study.J Nucl Med. 1995 Dec;36(12):2380-7. J Nucl Med. 1995. PMID: 8523135 Review.
-
Pleural effusion in pulmonary embolism.Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2012 Jul;18(4):347-54. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e32835395d5. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2012. PMID: 22498732 Review.
Cited by
-
Pleural effusions as a predictive parameter for poor prognosis for patients with acute pulmonary thromboembolism.J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2016 Oct;42(3):432-40. doi: 10.1007/s11239-016-1371-2. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2016. PMID: 27165281
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical