Randomised controlled comparison of single-dose ciprofloxacin and doxycycline for cholera caused by Vibrio cholerae 01 or 0139
- PMID: 8709688
- DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)01180-4
Randomised controlled comparison of single-dose ciprofloxacin and doxycycline for cholera caused by Vibrio cholerae 01 or 0139
Abstract
Background: Effective antimicrobial therapy can reduce the duration and volume of cholera diarrhoea by half. However, such treatment is currently limited by Vibrio cholerae resistance to the drugs commonly prescribed for cholera, and by the difficulties involved in the administration of multi-drug doses under field conditions. Because of its favourable pharmacokinetics we thought it likely that single-dose ciprofloxacin would be effective in the treatment of cholera.
Methods: In this double-blind study treatment was either a single 1 g oral dose of ciprofloxacin plus doxycycline placebo, or a single 300 mg oral dose of doxycycline plus ciprofloxacine placebo. 130 moderately or severely dehydrated men infected with V cholerae 01 and 130 infected with V cholerae 0139 were randomly assigned treatment. Patients stayed in hospital for 5 days. We measured fluid intake and stool volume every 6 h, and a sample of stool for culture was obtained daily. The primary outcome measures were clinical success--the cessation of watery stool within 48 h; and bacteriological success--absence of V cholerae from cultures of stool after study day 2.
Findings: Among patients infected with V cholerae 01, treatment was clinically successful in 62 (94%) of 66 patients who received ciprofloxacin and in 47 (73%) of 64 who receive doxycycline (difference 21% [95% Cl 8-33]); the corresponding proportions with bacteriological success were 63 (95%) and 44 (69%) (27% [14-39]). Among patients infected with V cholerae 0139, treatment was clinically successful in 54 (92%) of 59 patients who received ciprofloxacin and in 65 (92%) of 71 who received doxycycline (< 1% [-9 to 9]), and bacteriologically successful in 58 (98%) and 56 (79%), respectively (19% [9-30]). Total volume of watery stool did not differ significantly between ciprofloxacin-group and doxycycline-group patients infected with either V cholerae 01 or 0139. All but one of the V cholerae 01 and all of the 0139 isolates were susceptible in vitro to doxycycline, whereas 48 (37%) of the V cholerae 01 isolates and none of the 0139 isolates were resistant to tetracycline. Treatment clinically failed in 14 (52%) of 27 doxycycline-treated patients infected with a tetracycline-resistant V cholerae 01 strain, compared with three (8%) of 37 patients infected with a tetracycline-susceptible strain (44% [23-65]).
Interpretation: Single-dose ciprofloxacin is effective in the treatment of cholera caused by V cholerae 01 or 0139 and is better than single-dose doxycycline in the eradication of V cholerae from stool. Single-dose ciprofloxacin may also be the preferred treatment in areas where tetracycline-resistant V cholerae are common. In V cholerae, in-vitro doxycycline susceptibilities are not a useful indicator of the in-vivo efficacy of the drug.
Comment in
-
Ciprofloxacin for treating cholera.Lancet. 1996 Nov 23;348(9039):1446-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)70088-4. Lancet. 1996. PMID: 8937293 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Single-dose azithromycin for the treatment of cholera in adults.N Engl J Med. 2006 Jun 8;354(23):2452-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa054493. N Engl J Med. 2006. PMID: 16760445 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical features, antimicrobial susceptibility and toxin production in Vibrio cholerae O139 infection: comparison with V. cholerae O1 infection.Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1996 Jul-Aug;90(4):402-5. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(96)90522-2. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1996. PMID: 8882188
-
Randomised double blind trial of single dose doxycycline for treating cholera in adults.BMJ. 1990 Jun 23;300(6740):1619-21. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6740.1619. BMJ. 1990. PMID: 2196962 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Global status of tetracycline resistance among clinical isolates of Vibrio cholerae: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2021 Aug 6;10(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s13756-021-00985-w. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2021. PMID: 34362438 Free PMC article.
-
Mechanism and treatment of diarrhoea due to Vibrio cholerae and Escherichia coli: roles of drugs and prostaglandins.Dan Med Bull. 1996 Apr;43(2):173-85. Dan Med Bull. 1996. PMID: 8741209 Review.
Cited by
-
Management of infectious diarrhoea.Gut. 2004 Feb;53(2):296-305. doi: 10.1136/gut.2003.022103. Gut. 2004. PMID: 14724167 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
New developments in the understanding of cholera.Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2001 Aug;3(4):315-21. doi: 10.1007/s11894-001-0054-z. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2001. PMID: 11470000
-
Emergence of multidrug-resistant strain of Vibrio cholerae O1 in Bangladesh and reversal of their susceptibility to tetracycline after two years.J Health Popul Nutr. 2007 Jun;25(2):241-3. J Health Popul Nutr. 2007. PMID: 17985827 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
[Acute infectious diarrhea].Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2006 Dec;118(23-24 Suppl 3):137-51. doi: 10.1007/s11812-006-0017-2. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2006. PMID: 17674509 Free PMC article. Review. German. No abstract available.
-
Effect of cholera toxin on intestinal elimination of ciprofloxacin in rabbits.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 Feb;42(2):473-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.2.473. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998. PMID: 9527813 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical