Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1996;13(2):141-53.

[Spiral CT angiography in the diagnosis of central pulmonary embolism: comparison with pulmonary angiography and scintigraphy]

[Article in French]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 8711233
Comparative Study

[Spiral CT angiography in the diagnosis of central pulmonary embolism: comparison with pulmonary angiography and scintigraphy]

[Article in French]
O Cauvain et al. Rev Mal Respir. 1996.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of spiral CT angiography in the diagnosis of central pulmonary embolism (PE).

Material and methods: A retrospective study was undertaken in a population of 90 patients who were evaluated with spiral CT angiography (acquisition: 12 to 24 s with or without strict apnea; injection of 90 cm3 of 12, 20 or 30% contrast material at a rate of 4 to 7 cm3, selective pulmonary angiography of each lung (n = 55) and/or ventilation-perfusion (VP) scanning (n = 35).

Results: Among the 55 patients evaluated with both spiral CT and angiography, central pulmonary embolism was excluded in 19 patients (34%), assessed in 29 patients (53%) whereas CT examination was considered as inconclusive in 7 patients (13%) due to interpretive difficulties at the level of obliquely oriented arteries and/or presence of hilar lymph nodes (sensitivity: 90.5%; specificity: 82.6%). With spiral CT, the finding of 95 central emboli (3 main, 61 lobar and 31 segmental) corresponded exactly to the angiographic findings; spiral CT enabled direct visualization of intraluminal filling defects (n = 95) whereas the angiographic recognition of PE was based on direct (n = 57) and indirect (n = 38) signs. Spiral CT angiography was more sensitive and specific than VP scanning.

Conclusion: Spiral CT angiography appears as a sensitive and specific noninvasive method for the diagnosis of central PE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types