Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1996 Jun;15(4):15-22.

Evaluation of oxygen delivery with the use of nasopharyngeal catheters and nasal cannulas

  • PMID: 8716524
Clinical Trial

Evaluation of oxygen delivery with the use of nasopharyngeal catheters and nasal cannulas

J Wilson et al. Neonatal Netw. 1996 Jun.

Abstract

The purpose of this pilot study was to examine the differences between nasopharyngeal catheter and nasal cannula oxygen delivery systems in infants. Eleven subjects requiring supplemental oxygen were enrolled in the study. All infants received both therapies at three separate gas flow rates (0.5, 0.3, and 0.2 liters per minute). Infants had higher heart rates when receiving nasal cannula oxygen than when receiving nasopharyngeal catheter oxygen (p < .05). There were no significant differences between the two therapies when comparing pulmonary mechanics, hypopharyngeal oxygen concentrations, and respiratory rates. However, when oxygen was delivered at the higher flow (0.5 liters), heart rate, tidal volume, and oxygen concentration were higher, and respiratory rates were decreased for both methods (p < .05). Because minimal differences were found between these two methods, either may be an appropriate choice for delivering supplemental oxygen.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources