Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1977 Jun;53(3):173-9.
doi: 10.1136/sti.53.3.173.

Neonatal conjunctivitis caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis

Neonatal conjunctivitis caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis

E Rees et al. Br J Vener Dis. 1977 Jun.

Abstract

In a selected group of 103 babies referred with neonatal conjunctivitis Neisseria gonorrhoeae was isolated from 11 and Chlamydia trachomatis from 33. Concurrent infection was present in three. On toddler sibling developed chlamydial conjunctivitis. After treatment C. trachomatis was re-isolated from six babies during the follow-up period. The discharge started one to three days after delivery in only three babies with gonococcal conjunctivitis and at five to eight days in eight babies. One baby was delivered by caesarean section. N. gonorrhoeae was isolated from four asymptomatic fathers, all of whom had urethritis. The mean onset of discharge in the 33 babies from whom Chlamydia was isolated was 7-1 days. One baby was delivered by caesarean section. Chlamydial conjunctivitis was associated with a high incidence of prematurity and of postpartum infection in the mother. Ten fathers of Chlamydia-positive babies were examined. C. tachomatis was isolated from four, all of whom were asymptomatic but had low-grade urethritis. These findings confirm the pathogenic role of C. trachomatis in the cervix and indicate the importance to the family of an adequate microbiological investigation of neonatal conjunctivitis.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Lancet. 1959 May 2;1(7079):902-5 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1976 Dec 25;2(8000):1379-82 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1968 Aug 31;3(5617):527-8 - PubMed
    1. Br J Vener Dis. 1974 Feb;50(1):1-10 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1974 Sep 7;2(7880):555-6 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources