Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1996 Jun;40(6):1338-41.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.40.6.1338.

Electronic compliance assessment of antifungal prophylaxis for human immunodeficiency virus-infected women

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Electronic compliance assessment of antifungal prophylaxis for human immunodeficiency virus-infected women

S M Geletko et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996 Jun.

Abstract

Several prophylactic medications for opportunistic or recurrent infections are used in human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals. Essential to the efficacy evaluation of these agents is the accurate reporting of medication compliance. We hypothesized that poor patient compliance with thrice-weekly fluconazole prophylaxis would correlate with the occurrence of clinical events. Fluconazole compliance was monitored electronically by using the Medication Event Monitoring Systems with 19 women receiving fluconazole at 50 mg thrice weekly for prophylaxis of recurrent mucocutaneous candidiasis. During 202 patient-months of follow-up, eight breakthrough episodes of mucocutaneous candidiasis developed in four women; compliance data were available for seven of these episodes. At 6 months of therapy, more women with greater than or equal to 80% compliance were disease free compared with women with less than 80% compliance (P < 0.05; the Fisher exact test). These data suggest that documentation of medication compliance is essential in studies of chronic prophylaxis in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients to properly evaluate drug efficacy and to avoid erroneous conclusions concerning drug failure.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Br J Cancer. 1977 Jan;35(1):1-39 - PubMed
    1. J Pediatr. 1983 Jan;102(1):125-33 - PubMed
    1. Drugs. 1983 Jan;25(1):63-76 - PubMed
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1983 May;98(5 Pt 1):663-5 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1989 Jun 9;261(22):3273-7 - PubMed

Publication types