Similar articles

• Comparison of thrombolysis followed by broad use of percutaneous coronary intervention with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation acute myocardial infarction: data from the french registry on acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (FAST-MI).

  Danchin N, Coste P, Ferrières J, Steg PG, Cottin Y, Blanchard D, Belle L, Ritz B, Kirkorian G, Angioi M, Sans P, Charbonnier B, Eltchaninoff H, Guéret P, Khalife K, Asseman P, Puel J, Goldstein P, Cambou JP, Simon T; FAST-MI Investigators. Danchin N, et al. Circulation. 2008 Jul 15;118(3):268-76. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.762765. Epub 2008 Jun 30. Circulation. 2008. PMID: 18591434
• Should thrombolysis or primary angioplasty be the treatment of choice for acute myocardial infarction? Primary angioplasty--the strategy of choice.

  Grines CL. Grines CL. N Engl J Med. 1996 Oct 24;335(17):1313-6; discussion 1316-7. N Engl J Med. 1996. PMID: 8857014 No abstract available.
• Primary angioplasty versus thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction.

  Boersma E, Akkerhuis M, Simoons ML. Boersma E, et al. N Engl J Med. 2000 Mar 23;342(12):890-1; author reply 891-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200003233421211. N Engl J Med. 2000. PMID: 10733372 No abstract available.
• [Thrombolysis and coronary dilatation in therapy of acute myocardial infarct].

  Neumann FJ, Schömig A. Neumann FJ, et al. Internist (Berl). 1994 Dec;35(12):1124-36. Internist (Berl). 1994. PMID: 7883516 Review. German. No abstract available.
• [Acute myocardial infarct--primary angioplasty or thrombolysis?].

  Kelm M, Strauer BE. Kelm M, et al. Internist (Berl). 2000 Dec;41(12):1331-6, 1338-40, 1342-3. Internist (Berl). 2000. PMID: 11189068 Review. German. No abstract available.