Sterilization
- PMID: 8736725
- DOI: 10.1016/s0950-3552(96)80065-4
Sterilization
Abstract
Sterilization is accepted as a permanent method of contraception by many couples in the world. Female sterilization is more widely used than male sterilization, but the latter is used by many couples in developed countries. The most widely used methods for female sterilization are simple tubal ligation, electrocautery of the fallopian tubes, and occlusion of the tubes by Hulka or Filshie clips or Falope rings. These procedures may be carried out either by minilaparotomy or by laparoscopy, under local anaesthesia. Sterilization may be performed immediately following pregnancy, or as an interval operation. The effectiveness of female sterilization is high, with failure rates of about 1-2 per 1000 procedures. Immediate complications are few and minor, while there appear to be no serious, long-term adverse effects. It is possible that there is a protective effect against ovarian cancer. Potential new technologies for female sterilization include the use of chemicals, such as quinacrine, for transcervical tubal occlusion, and hysteroscopic methods. Male sterilization is more simple and can readily be performed under local anaesthesia. A new technique originating in China, the no-scalpel technique, has made the procedure even more simple and produces fewer complications such as haematoma. It is possible that the direct injection of plug-forming material into the vas may render the procedure more reversible. Concerns about possible adverse effects of vasectomy on cardiovascular diseases and testicular cancer largely have been dispelled, but a possible weak association between vasectomy and prostatic cancer continues to be studied.
PIP: At present, the most widely used methods for female sterilization are simple tubal ligation, electrocautery of the fallopian tubes, and occlusion of the tubes by Hulka or Filshie clips or Falope rings. Potential new technologies include hysteroscopic methods and the use of chemicals such as quinacrine for transcervical tubal occlusion. Even more technical advances have occurred with male sterilization and concerns about a link to cardiovascular diseases and testicular cancer have been largely dispelled. The no-scalpel technique, originated in China, has made male sterilization simpler and free from complications such as hematoma. Direct injection of plug-forming material into the vas may increase the possibility of male sterilization reversal. Reviewed in this article is the clinical research on the effectiveness, long-term effects, reversibility, and surgical approaches of current and potential methods of sexual sterilization.
Similar articles
-
Sterilization.Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1984 Dec;11(3):603-40. Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1984. PMID: 6239731 Review.
-
New methods, increased safety make sterilization popular choice.Netw Res Triangle Park N C. 1985 Summer;6(4):1-2. Netw Res Triangle Park N C. 1985. PMID: 12340324
-
Complications of female sterilization: immediate and delayed.Fertil Steril. 1984 Mar;41(3):337-55. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)47709-5. Fertil Steril. 1984. PMID: 6230257
-
[Sterilization using clips].Vie Med. 1985 Feb 3;66(6):257-72. Vie Med. 1985. PMID: 12341040 French.
-
Vasal sterilization in China.Contraception. 1993 Sep;48(3):255-65. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(93)90144-v. Contraception. 1993. PMID: 8222655 Review.
Cited by
-
Trends in vasectomy. Analysis of one teaching practice.Can Fam Physician. 1998 Mar;44:552-7. Can Fam Physician. 1998. PMID: 9559195 Free PMC article.
-
Different intervals between vasectomy and sperm retrieval interfere in the reproductive capacity from vasectomized men.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2003 Jan;20(1):33-7. doi: 10.1023/a:1021210805867. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2003. PMID: 12645866 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Medical