Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1996:14 Suppl 1:S48-50.
doi: 10.1007/BF00182065.

Polytetrafluoroethylene sling for failure in female stress incontinence surgery

Affiliations

Polytetrafluoroethylene sling for failure in female stress incontinence surgery

C Errando et al. World J Urol. 1996.

Abstract

Surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women with previous interventions is often difficult and yields poor results. A total of 33 women with recurrent SUI underwent placement of a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) sling after a mean of 1.5 (range, 1-3) unsuccessful operations. Preoperative bladder instability (BI) was ruled out in all cases. The patients' mean age was 54 (range, 34-79) years. In all, 64% had SUI and 36% had SUI and incontinence at rest. The Aldrige-Stoeckel technique is used with insertion of a 2 x 30 cm sling instead of fascia lata. Mean operating time was reduced in 40 minutes. After a mean follow-up period of 13 months, 72% of the patients achieved continence without retention (complete success). Altogether, 16 patients (48%) required self-catheterization after discharge, with the voiding imbalance lasting for more than 3 months in only 4 cases (12% of the total). Three patients underwent surgery for outlet obstruction. There were five abdominal wound infections but no vaginal wound infection. Two slings have since been removed (one partially), but none has eroded through the urethra. The PTFE sling is a reasonable option for this group of patients. Retention is usually self-limited, and most complications can be managed successfully.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1990;69(1):51-4 - PubMed
    1. Actas Urol Esp. 1990 Jul-Aug;14(4):271-3 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 1989 Oct;142(4):1037-8; discussion 1038-9 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Jan 15;151(2):224-6 - PubMed
    1. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985 Nov;92(11):1189-91 - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources