Epidural spinal cord stimulation in the management of spasms in spinal cord injury: a prospective study
- PMID: 8746504
- DOI: 10.1159/000098744
Epidural spinal cord stimulation in the management of spasms in spinal cord injury: a prospective study
Abstract
Forty-eight spinal cord injury victims were implanted with an epidural spinal cord stimulation system to treat spasms that had not satisfactorily responded to medical therapy. All the patients were at least 6 months after the injury. The protocol included assessment by independent examiners preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after the implant. Pre- and postoperative data collection included the frequency and severity of the spasms. Combining the frequency and intensity scores into a 'severity' score provided a more accurate clinical picture. No patient observed neurological deterioration following the surgical procedure or the neurostimulation treatment. A statistically significant reduction in the severity of the spasms was observed in the follow-up evaluations, with results that progressively increased in time. It is appears that spinal cord stimulation is an effective and safe alternative in the management of spasms in spinal cord injury victims. Its exact role in relation to intrathecal baclofen infusion and ablative procedures remains to be defined.
Similar articles
-
Epidural spinal cord stimulation for the control of spasticity in spinal cord injury patients lacks long-term efficacy and is not cost-effective.Spinal Cord. 1998 Mar;36(3):190-2. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100532. Spinal Cord. 1998. PMID: 9554020
-
Surgical management of spasticity and spasms in spinal cord injury: an overview.J Am Paraplegia Soc. 1988 Jan-Apr;11(1):9-13. doi: 10.1080/01952307.1988.11735787. J Am Paraplegia Soc. 1988. PMID: 3288715 Review.
-
Intrathecal baclofen for intractable spasticity of spinal origin: results of a long-term multicenter study.J Neurosurg. 1993 Feb;78(2):226-32. doi: 10.3171/jns.1993.78.2.0226. J Neurosurg. 1993. PMID: 8421205 Clinical Trial.
-
Continuous intrathecal infusion of baclofen in patients with spasticity caused by spinal cord injuries.Neurosurg Rev. 2002 Aug;25(4):228-30. doi: 10.1007/s10143-002-0221-1. Epub 2002 Apr 13. Neurosurg Rev. 2002. PMID: 12172730
-
Intrathecal baclofen for severe spasticity secondary to spinal cord injury.Ann Pharmacother. 1993 Jun;27(6):767-74. doi: 10.1177/106002809302700618. Ann Pharmacother. 1993. PMID: 8329801 Review.
Cited by
-
A Comparison of FES and SCS for Neuroplastic Recovery After SCI: Historical Perspectives and Future Directions.Front Neurol. 2020 Jun 30;11:607. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00607. eCollection 2020. Front Neurol. 2020. PMID: 32714270 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Management of spasticity after spinal cord injury: current techniques and future directions.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 Jan;24(1):23-33. doi: 10.1177/1545968309343213. Epub 2009 Sep 1. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010. PMID: 19723923 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A systematic review of computational models for the design of spinal cord stimulation therapies: from neural circuits to patient-specific simulations.J Physiol. 2023 Aug;601(15):3103-3121. doi: 10.1113/JP282884. Epub 2022 Dec 27. J Physiol. 2023. PMID: 36409303 Free PMC article.
-
Long-Term Spinal Cord Stimulation After Chronic Complete Spinal Cord Injury Enables Volitional Movement in the Absence of Stimulation.Front Syst Neurosci. 2020 Jun 30;14:35. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2020.00035. eCollection 2020. Front Syst Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 32714156 Free PMC article.
-
Initiating extension of the lower limbs in subjects with complete spinal cord injury by epidural lumbar cord stimulation.Exp Brain Res. 2004 Feb;154(3):308-26. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1666-3. Epub 2003 Oct 25. Exp Brain Res. 2004. PMID: 14586532
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical