Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1996 Sep;62(9):738-44.

Stereotactic breast biopsy: improved tissue harvesting with the Mammotome

Affiliations
  • PMID: 8751765

Stereotactic breast biopsy: improved tissue harvesting with the Mammotome

F Burbank et al. Am Surg. 1996 Sep.

Abstract

The current study was performed to determine whether the Mammotome, a new breast biopsy instrument, is better at harvesting breast tissue percutaneously than an automated Tru-Cut (ATC) device. A total of 345 stereotactic breast biopsies were performed with the Mammotome. The Mammotome specimens were clinically evaluated on a five-point specimen scale that reflected the quality and quantity of the specimens and the rapidity of collection. In selected cases, specimen weights from both techniques were measured. In addition, by examining the lesion site post-biopsy, biopsies were categorized as incisional or excisional. Specimens obtained with the Mammotome were two times heavier than when obtained with the Biopty gun (34.3 mg vs. 17.2 mg, P < or = 0.0002). When aggregate Mammotome specimen weights were regressed against number of specimens submitted, average weight per specimen was 31.9 mg (P < or = 0.0001). When compared with the ATC device on the specimen scale, the Mammotome specimens were rated "Average" in 2.1 percent, "Good" in 13 percent, and "Very Good" in 84.9 percent. Also, 51.9 percent of the biopsies with the Mammotome were judged to be incisional; 48.1 percent, excisional. Three minor complications were encountered. The Mammotome more quickly harvests more breast tissue compared with ATC technology.

PubMed Disclaimer