Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1996 Aug;57(8):329-32.

Impact of a smoking ban on a locked psychiatric unit

Affiliations
  • PMID: 8752014

Impact of a smoking ban on a locked psychiatric unit

E Haller et al. J Clin Psychiatry. 1996 Aug.

Abstract

Background: This study prospectively evaluated the impact of a complete smoking ban on a locked psychiatric unit.

Method: The setting was a 16-bed inpatient unit with 83% (134/162) involuntary patients, no off-unit smoking area, no possibility of granting smoking passes, and a mean length of stay of 2 weeks. The effect of a complete smoking ban was measured by surveys of both staff and patients before and after the ban. In addition, objective indicators of ward disruption were measured, including rates of aggression, use of p.r.n. medications, need for seclusion and restraints, elopement, and discharges against medical advice.

Results: Although staff initially expressed concern about the ban's potential negative impact, after it began, t tests revealed that staff were significantly (p < .05) less concerned about patients' needing more medication, becoming restless, being too fragile to cope with withdrawal, leaving the unit against medical advice, or trying to elope. Staff were significantly (p < .02) more positive about the ban than were patients. Although patients, overall, had negative views toward the new policy, their opinions were somewhat less negative after its implementation. Rates of assaultive behavior, use of seclusion and restraints, use of p.r.n. medication, and against-medical-advice or elopement discharges did not change after the ban was in effect. When polled, 78% (40/51) of the staff voted to keep the ban.

Conclusion: This study found that staff anticipated negative consequences to a total smoking ban; however, their attitudes changed after it began. The ban had no significant impact on the ward milieu, and although patients were not in favor of it, they felt less negative over time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources