Relative morbidity of abdominal hysterectomy and myomectomy for management of uterine leiomyomas

Abstract

Objective: To compare the morbidity of total abdominal hysterectomy and abdominal myomectomy in the surgical management of uterine leiomyomas.

Methods: Hospital records were reviewed for all women who underwent hysterectomy (n = 89) or myomectomy (n = 103) between May 1, 1988, and May 1, 1993, for the preoperative diagnosis of leiomyoma.

Results: There were significant differences between the two groups for average age (hysterectomy 39.2 years, myomectomy 34.4 years; mean difference 4.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] of difference 3.7-5.9), uterine size (hysterectomy 15.2, myomectomy 11.5 weeks; mean difference 3.8, 95% CI of difference 2.0-5.4) and use of a GnRH agonist (hysterectomy 23.6%, myomectomy 55.3%; relative risk [RR] 0.4, 95% CI 0.3-0.6). Myomectomy was associated with decreased estimated blood loss (hysterectomy 796 mL, myomectomy 464 mL; mean difference 331, 95% CI 121-542) and febrile morbidity (risk of temperature 38C or 48 or more hours postoperatively: for hysterectomy 49.4%, for myomectomy 32%; RR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.2). Using multivariate linear regression, estimated blood loss was similar between the groups after controlling for uterine size. There was no difference in blood transfusion rates. There were two ureteral, one bladder, one bowel, and one femoral nerve injury in the hysterectomy group, and there were no intraoperative visceral injuries in the myomectomy group.

Conclusion: Myomectomy compares favorably to hysterectomy in the surgical management of leiomyomas, with a possible decreased risk for visceral injury and infection.