Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1996;26(8):499-501.
doi: 10.1007/BF01372228.

Safe use of power injectors with central and peripheral venous access devices for pediatric CT

Affiliations

Safe use of power injectors with central and peripheral venous access devices for pediatric CT

S C Kaste et al. Pediatr Radiol. 1996.

Abstract

Purpose: We report our experience in the safe use of power injectors with central and small-gauge peripheral venous access devices for intravenous administration of contrast agent to children undergoing computed tomography (CT) examinations.

Materials and methods: We reviewed the medical records of 500 patients randomly selected from the 3121 children who underwent intravenous contrast-enhanced CT examinations at our institution from November 1993 through July 1995.

Results: The group of 500 patients, all younger than 18 years of age, accounts for 16 % of the contrast-enhanced CT examinations performed during the study period. Medrad MCT 311 Mark V or Medrad MCT Plus 311 power injectors were used to intravenously administer Omnipaque 300 (2 ml/kg, maximum dose = 150 ml) through venous access devices. These devices comprised Hickman or Broviac lines (n = 228), subcutaneous Port-A-Caths (n = 55), small-gauge butterfly needles (n = 215), and percutaneous intravenous central lines (n = 2). Two complications, one involving a Hickman line and the other a subcutaneous Port-A-Cath, occurred in the study population. These complications correspond to a frequency of 0.4 %. Six cases of contrast extravasation, all of them with the use of 23- (n = 1) and 25-gauge (n = 5) butterfly catheters (frequency = 0.2 %), occurred among the remaining 2621 cases.

Conclusion: In light of the low frequency of complications, power injectors and central venous access devices or small-gauge butterfly catheters are safe systems for delivery of intravenous contrast material to pediatric patients. We feel that our strict adherence to manufacturers' guidelines and previously reported techniques partially accounts for our success with these modes of delivery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1980 Sep;135(3):455-61 - PubMed
    1. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1986 Mar-Apr;10 (2):369-71 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 1984 Jun;151(3):800 - PubMed
    1. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1989 Mar;16(3):195-8 - PubMed
    1. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1986 Nov-Dec;10(6):1000-2 - PubMed

Publication types