Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1996 Aug;101(4):316-28.
doi: 10.1016/0924-980x(96)95560-5.

Contralateral and ipsilateral EMG responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation during recovery of arm and hand function after stroke

Affiliations

Contralateral and ipsilateral EMG responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation during recovery of arm and hand function after stroke

A Turton et al. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996 Aug.

Abstract

We examined the relationship between the recovery of hand and arm function in a group of hemiplegic stroke patients and the presence of short-latency EMG responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in 4 different upper limb muscles (deltoid, biceps, extensor digitorum communis and the first dorsal interosseous). Twenty-one patients were examined within 5 weeks of stroke (median 2 weeks), and then at regular intervals over the next 12 months. Some patients recovered rapidly (Group A); in others, recovery was slow and incomplete (Group B). Even at the first test, Group A patients had responses to TMS in all muscles. Most Group B patients initially lacked responses in all tested upper limb muscles; in those that later were able to activate hand muscles, responses returned at or just before this stage of recovery. No such clear correlation between the presence of responses to TMS and ability to activate more proximal arm muscles was evident. Response latency was initially long and declined in a manner that was highly correlated with muscle strength and hand function test scores. Ipsilateral responses were elicited from both the affected and unaffected hemispheres. Ipsilateral responses from the latter were most common in the proximal muscles of the affected limb, and had latencies that were longer than those elicited in the contralateral (unaffected) arm. Nine cases of ipsilateral responses in hand muscles were found; such responses are not found in healthy subjects. Ipsilateral responses from the undamaged hemisphere were more prevalent in the poorly recovered patients; the underlying mechanisms may not be beneficial for recovery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources