Randomized prospective comparison of needle colposuspension versus endopelvic fascia plication for potential stress incontinence prophylaxis in women undergoing vaginal reconstruction for stage III or IV pelvic organ prolapse. The Continence Program for Women Research Group
- PMID: 8765249
- DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70142-4
Randomized prospective comparison of needle colposuspension versus endopelvic fascia plication for potential stress incontinence prophylaxis in women undergoing vaginal reconstruction for stage III or IV pelvic organ prolapse. The Continence Program for Women Research Group
Abstract
Objective: Severe prolapse may mask potential genuine stress urinary incontinence in women. Some have suggested that a suspending urethropexy be performed in women who have potential genuine stress incontinence demonstrated by barrier reduction of the prolapse preoperatively. Our aim was to compare outcomes after prolapse surgery that included a formal bladder neck suspension with those operations that did not.
Study design: This prospective randomized clinical trial assigned 32 women with bladder neck hypermobility and stage III or IV pelvic organ prolapse to receive either a needle colposuspension or bladder neck endopelvic fascia plication as part of the vaginal reconstructive surgery. Twenty-nine subjects underwent detailed clinical, anatomic, urodynamic, and quality-of-life evaluations before and 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery; 23 completed urinary diary and quality-of-life evaluations after a mean of 2.9 years.
Results: Needle colposuspension increased short-term complications without providing additional protection from de novo stress incontinence. Barrier testing before surgery predicted urethral sphincteric resistance after surgery; however, such testing neither predicted a patient's function after surgery nor indicated the need for a suspending urethropexy. The combination of a needle colposuspension with a sacrospinous ligament suspension predisposed to the early development of support defects of the upper anterior vaginal segment and to failure of bladder neck support.
Conclusions: Preoperative barrier testing in women with severe prolapse is not useful in identifying individuals who require a suspending urethropexy. Needle colposuspension increases short-term complications, lacks durability, and may predispose to early and severe recurrent anterior prolapse when performed with a sacrospinous ligament vault suspension.
Comment in
-
Modified Gittes's needle colposuspension method complemented with the laparoscopic ventrosuspension of the uterus for the treatment of stress incontinence associated with stage III or IV pelvic organ prolapse.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jun;176(6):1394-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70367-3. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997. PMID: 9215206 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: a short version Cochrane review.Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(1):3-12. doi: 10.1002/nau.20542. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008. PMID: 18092333 Review.
-
A retrospective comparison of abdominal sacrocolpopexy with Burch colposuspension versus sacrospinous fixation with transvaginal needle suspension for the management of vaginal vault prolapse and coexisting stress incontinence.Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1999;10(6):390-3. doi: 10.1007/s001920050066. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1999. PMID: 10614976
-
Combined pelvic reconstructive surgery and transobturator tape (monarc) in women with advanced prolapse and urodynamic stress incontinence: a case control series.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Mar-Apr;16(2):163-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.12.004. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19249703
-
Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2018 Apr 17;319(15):1554-1565. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.2827. JAMA. 2018. PMID: 29677302 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women: a short version Cochrane review.Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(6):472-80. doi: 10.1002/nau.20780. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009. PMID: 19591206 Review.
Cited by
-
Pelvic organ prolapse surgery with and without tension-free vaginal tape in women with occult or asymptomatic urodynamic stress incontinence: a randomised controlled trial.Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Jan;25(1):33-40. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2150-7. Epub 2013 Jun 28. Int Urogynecol J. 2014. PMID: 23812579 Clinical Trial.
-
The Bologna bladder neck suspension procedure for treatment of stress urinary incontinence associated with cystocele.Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1998;9(6):370-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02199567. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1998. PMID: 9891958
-
Transvaginal cystocele repair by purse-string technique reinforced with three simple sutures: surgical technique and results.Int Neurourol J. 2012 Sep;16(3):144-8. doi: 10.5213/inj.2012.16.3.144. Epub 2012 Sep 30. Int Neurourol J. 2012. PMID: 23094221 Free PMC article.
-
Is there any evidence to advocate SUI prevention in continent women undergoing prolapse repair? An overview.Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Feb;20(2):235-45. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0734-4. Epub 2008 Oct 21. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009. PMID: 18936868 Review.
-
Surgical strategies for women with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary stress incontinence.Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Feb;21(2):179-86. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-1007-6. Epub 2009 Nov 26. Int Urogynecol J. 2010. PMID: 19940978 Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical