Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1996 Aug;41(8):1643-8.
doi: 10.1007/BF02087914.

Ultrasonographic detection of intestinal complications in Crohn's disease

Affiliations

Ultrasonographic detection of intestinal complications in Crohn's disease

G Maconi et al. Dig Dis Sci. 1996 Aug.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound (US) in assessing the main abdominal complications of Crohn's disease (CD), such as strictures, fistulas and abscesses. A series of 98 consecutive inpatients with complicated and uncomplicated Crohn's disease, having undergone a complete endoscopic and radiographic evaluation of the intestinal tract, entered the study. In particular, in these patients the presence of strictures, fistulas, and abscesses, detected by means of colonoscopy, small bowel x-ray, double-contrast barium enema, and computed tomography, was also assessed by means of transabdominal US. US sensitivity and specificity in the assessment of stenosis of Crohn's disease were 74.4% and 93.1%, respectively. When ileal and colonic stenosis were considered separately, transabdominal US correctly assessed 84.6% of ileal stenosis and 58.8% of colonic stenosis. Eight of 12 fistulas were detected, but only 50% of enteroenteric fistulas were diagnosed. The presence of abscesses was correctly detected in 83.3% of cases by means of US. Our data suggest that US is a suitable complementary method for the detection of abdominal complications of Crohn's disease, such as strictures and abscesses; however, its usefulness in assessing enteroenteric fistulas seems to be fairly limited.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Clin Radiol. 1990 Dec;42(6):410-3 - PubMed
    1. Gastroenterology. 1976 Aug;71(2):245-50 - PubMed
    1. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1978 Dec;2(12):1047-54 - PubMed
    1. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1986 Oct;21(8):969-72 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 1993 Sep;188(3):649-53 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources