Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1996 May;15(5):506-15.

Left ventricular dysfunction after heart transplantation: incidence and role of enhanced immunosuppression

Affiliations
  • PMID: 8771506

Left ventricular dysfunction after heart transplantation: incidence and role of enhanced immunosuppression

D McNamara et al. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1996 May.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence, natural history, and outcome of left ventricular dysfunction in 102 consecutive heart transplant recipients. Left ventricular dysfunction (defined as a decline in the echocardiographic ejection fraction to < 0.45) occurred in 16 of 102 transplant recipients (16%) at a mean of 9.7 +/- 8.6 (standard deviation) months after transplantation.

Methods: Diagnostic evaluation included right heart catheterization and endomyocardial biopsy in all patients and coronary angiography in 13 patients.

Results: Four patients were found to have moderate cellular rejection (International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation grade 2 or higher) and were treated with enhanced immunosuppression. Two patients had angiographically apparent coronary allograft vasculopathy; both died of electromechanical dissociation within 4 months. The remaining ten patients had no or mild cellular rejection (International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation grade 0 or 1). Therapy in these ten patients included corticosteroids (n = 8). OKT3 (n = 5), and plasmapheresis (n = 2). Three patients died within 2 months of diagnosis, two from undetected severe coronary allograft vasculopathy and one from unrecognized constrictive pericarditis. The echocardiographic ejection fraction improved in the surviving patients after enhanced immunosuppressive therapy (0.33 to 0.53, p < 0.005). With the benefit of long-term clinical follow-up and autopsy data, the origins of left ventricular dysfunction in the 16 patients included moderate cellular rejection (n = 4), vascular rejection (n = 1), coronary allograft vasculopathy (n = 3), intercurrent cytomegalovirus infection (n = 1), constrictive pericarditis (n = 1), and either mild or no evident rejection (n = 6). Survival of the 16 patients with left ventricular dysfunction was similar to that of the 86 patients without left ventricular dysfunction.

Conclusions: The cause of left ventricular dysfunction after heart transplantation includes cellular rejection, vascular rejection, coronary allograft vasculopathy, cytomegalovirus infection, constrictive pericarditis, and unexplained mechanisms. Given the improvement in left ventricular function observed after empiric therapy with enhanced immunosuppression in patients with left ventricular dysfunction, immune-mediated phenomena may play an important pathogenic role.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources