Sharing antenatal care: client satisfaction and use of the 'patient-held record'
- PMID: 8775241
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1996.tb02912.x
Sharing antenatal care: client satisfaction and use of the 'patient-held record'
Abstract
Two hundred women (148 shared care patients and 52 clinic patients) completed a questionnaire about care received during pregnancy and the use of a patient-held record. Women receiving shared care reported higher levels of satisfaction with their care than clinic patients (p < 0.0001). Thirty-six percent of the women in shared care forgot to take their record to an appointment on at least 1 occasion. During the pregnancy, over half of the respondents in both groups made contact with the hospital for reasons other than for their regular visit. For both groups, convenience was the most frequently reported reason for choosing their model of care. Other important issues for shared care patients were that the service was more personal and more information was provided. Among clinic patients, safety and quality of care were identified as important. Problems involved with the patient holding the only complete pregnancy record are discussed.
Similar articles
-
The introduction of a woman-held record into a hospital antenatal clinic: the bring your own records study.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Feb;39(1):54-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1999.tb03445.x. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999. PMID: 10099751 Clinical Trial.
-
As good as anyone: antenatal shared care at an inner Sydney hospital.Aust Health Rev. 1995;18(4):95-104. doi: 10.1071/ah950095. Aust Health Rev. 1995. PMID: 10154020
-
Carrying their own medical records: the perspective of pregnant women.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001 Nov;41(4):398-401. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.2001.tb01316.x. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001. PMID: 11787912 Clinical Trial.
-
The antenatal care debate.East Mediterr Health J. 2001 Nov;7(6):1046-55. East Mediterr Health J. 2001. PMID: 15332747 Review.
-
The prenatal medical record: purpose, organization and the debate of print versus electronic.Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2008 Sep;35(3):355-68, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2008.06.001. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2008. PMID: 18760224 Review.
Cited by
-
See How They Grow: Testing the feasibility of a mobile app to support parents' understanding of child growth charts.PLoS One. 2021 Feb 19;16(2):e0246045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246045. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33606687 Free PMC article.
-
Patients' views on the effectiveness of patient-held records: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):2666-77. doi: 10.1111/hex.12240. Epub 2014 Jul 24. Health Expect. 2015. PMID: 25059439 Free PMC article.
-
Data re-entry overload: time for a paradigm shift in maternity IT?J R Soc Med. 2011 Oct;104(10):405-12. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110153. J R Soc Med. 2011. PMID: 21969478 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patient-Held Maternal and/or Child Health Records: Meeting the Information Needs of Patients and Healthcare Providers in Developing Countries?Online J Public Health Inform. 2011;3(2):ojphi.v3i2.3631. doi: 10.5210/ojphi.v3i2.3631. Epub 2011 Nov 7. Online J Public Health Inform. 2011. PMID: 23569604 Free PMC article.
-
Usability and Perception of a Wearable-Integrated Digital Maternity Record App in Germany: User Study.JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2023 Dec 15;6:e50765. doi: 10.2196/50765. JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2023. PMID: 38109377 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical