Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1996 Apr;13(4):351-5.
doi: 10.1007/BF02070151.

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection improving embryo quality: comparison of the sibling oocytes of non-male-factor couples

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection improving embryo quality: comparison of the sibling oocytes of non-male-factor couples

D Yang et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1996 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: Our objective was to investigate whether the quality of embryos developed after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is better than that of conventional IVF embryos.

Methods: Nine couples who previously achieved a normal rate of fertilization following IVF and four couples whose normal rate of fertilization was expected were involved in this study. The oocytes from those couples were randomly divided into two groups, group A by conventional insemination and group B by ICSI. The fertilization rate and quality of embryos were compared.

Results: Normal fertilization was achieved in 61% of the oocytes (83/136) after conventional insemination. In group B, 69% of the oocytes (99/144) achieved normal fertilization, although only 127 metaphase II oocytes were injected using the ICSI technique. More grade A embryos were obtained when the ICSI technique was used for fertilization than by conventional IVF (35.4 and 24.3%, respectively; P = 0.028).

Conclusions: A similar fertilization rate can be achieved by ICSI in comparison with conventional IVF, when male factor is not involved. Embryos after ICSI have an improved quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hum Reprod. 1989 Oct;4(7):798-804 - PubMed
    1. Mol Reprod Dev. 1991 Sep;30(1):70-8 - PubMed
    1. Hum Reprod. 1993 Jul;8(7):1061-6 - PubMed
    1. Fertil Steril. 1994 Oct;62(4):781-5 - PubMed
    1. J Reprod Fertil. 1987 Nov;81(2):459-69 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources