The Oregon priority-setting exercise: cost-effectiveness and the rule of rescue, revisited

D Hadorn¹

Affiliations

Comment

D Hadorn. Med Decis Making. 1996 Apr-Jun.

. 1996 Apr-Jun;16(2):117-9.

doi: 10.1177/0272989X9601600203.

D Hadorn¹

¹ National Advisory Committee on Core Health and Disability Support Services Ministry of Health Wellington, New Zealand.

No abstract available

Comment on

Individual utilities are inconsistent with rationing choices: A partial explanation of why Oregon's cost-effectiveness list failed.
Ubel PA, Loewenstein G, Scanlon D, Kamlet M. Ubel PA, et al. Med Decis Making. 1996 Apr-Jun;16(2):108-16. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9601600202. Med Decis Making. 1996. PMID: 8778528
Oregon's Medicaid ranking and cost-effectiveness: is there any relationship?
Tengs TO, Meyer G, Siegel JE, Pliskin JS, Graham JD, Weinstein MC. Tengs TO, et al. Med Decis Making. 1996 Apr-Jun;16(2):99-107. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9601600201. Med Decis Making. 1996. PMID: 8778541