Measurement properties of a self-administered outcome measure in lumbar spinal stenosis
- PMID: 8779009
- DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199604010-00004
Measurement properties of a self-administered outcome measure in lumbar spinal stenosis
Abstract
Study design: The measurement properties and validity of a newly developed patient questionnaire for the assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis was tested in an ongoing prospective multicenter observational study of patients undergoing decompressive surgery in three teaching hospitals.
Objective: The goal of the study was to develop a short, self-administered questionnaire on symptom severity, physical functional status, and patient satisfaction.
Summary of background data: The measure is intended to complement existing generic measures of spinal-related disability and health status. The questionnaire includes three scales with seven questions on symptom severity, five on physical function, and six on satisfaction.
Methods: The internal consistency of the scales was assessed with Cronbach's coefficient alpha on cross-sectional data from 193 patients before surgery. The test-retest reliability was assessed on data from a random sample of 23 patients using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. The responsiveness was assessed on 130 patients with 6-month follow-up data using the standardized response mean.
Results: The test-retest reliability of the scales ranged from 0.82 to 0.96, the internal consistency from 0.64 to 0.92, and the responsiveness from 0.96 to 1.07. The direction, statistical significance, and strength of hypothesized relationships with external criteria were as expected.
Conclusions: This short self-administered spinal stenosis measure is reproducible, internally consistent, valid, and highly responsive. It can be used to complement generic instruments in outcome assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
Similar articles
-
Reliability and validity of simplified Chinese version of Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire for patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 May 1;39(10):820-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000273. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014. PMID: 24525991
-
Psychometric Assessment of the Japanese Version of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ): Reliability and Validity.PLoS One. 2016 Jul 28;11(7):e0160183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160183. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27467254 Free PMC article.
-
Severity of symptoms, physical functioning and satisfaction in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a validation study of the Iranian version of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Score.J Neurosurg Sci. 2014 Sep;58(3):177-82. J Neurosurg Sci. 2014. PMID: 25033977
-
Psychometric properties of selected tests in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.Spine J. 2012 Oct;12(10):921-31. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 Jun 28. Spine J. 2012. PMID: 22749295 Clinical Trial.
-
Measurement of Treatment Effects Requires Instruments Responsive to Change Based on the Minimal Important Difference.Clin Chem. 2019 May;65(5):708-709. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2018.290817. Epub 2019 Feb 15. Clin Chem. 2019. PMID: 30770377 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Smartphone-based real-life activity data for physical performance outcome in comparison to conventional subjective and objective outcome measures after degenerative lumbar spine surgery.Brain Spine. 2022 Mar 18;2:100881. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2022.100881. eCollection 2022. Brain Spine. 2022. PMID: 36248147 Free PMC article.
-
Somatic comorbidity and younger age are associated with life dissatisfaction among patients with lumbar spinal stenosis before surgical treatment.Eur Spine J. 2007 Jul;16(7):857-64. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0080-5. Epub 2006 Mar 15. Eur Spine J. 2007. PMID: 16538522 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment-based classification for low back pain: systematic review with meta-analysis.J Man Manip Ther. 2022 Aug;30(4):207-227. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2021.2024677. Epub 2022 Jan 24. J Man Manip Ther. 2022. PMID: 35067217 Free PMC article.
-
Study-protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing clinical and radiological results after three different posterior decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: the Spinal Stenosis Trial (SST) (part of the NORDSTEN Study).BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Mar 21;18(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1491-7. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017. PMID: 28327114 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Understanding the mechanisms of a combined physical and psychological intervention for people with neurogenic claudication: protocol for a causal mediation analysis of the BOOST trial.BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 2;10(9):e037121. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037121. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32878759 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials