Comparison of high-resolution endoluminal sonography to video endoscopy in the detection and evaluation of esophageal varices

Abstract

High-resolution endoluminal sonography (HRES) was used to image and measure esophageal varices in control subjects and patients with portal hypertension and compared with endoscopic findings. Nine control patients and 68 patients with known cirrhosis or noncirrhotic portal hypertension underwent videotaped HRES and videotaped esophagoscopy (EGD). Two blinded investigators reviewed the videotapes to determine the presence and size of the largest esophageal varix in each patient. The largest varix by HRES was measured with the esophagus at rest at a point where the varix appeared most circular. The largest varix seen on EGD was graded on a 5-point scale. All nine of the control patients were correctly identified by both EGD and HRES as grade I (no varices). Eight of the 10 patients with no varices seen on EGD had varices identified by HRES. The interobserver correlation for HRES was r = .88 and for EGD was r = .79. The correlation between EGD and HRES was r = .50. High resolution endoluminal sonography allows quantitative measurement of variceal size, is a more sensitive and reproducible imaging modality than esophagoscopy for the detection and sizing of esophageal varices. There is poor correlation between monographic measurement and endoscopic grading of esophageal varices. Assessment of esophageal variceal presence and the measurement of variceal size by high resolution endoluminal sonography is an accurate, reproducible method of determining the size of esophageal varices.