Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1996;258(3):119-23.
doi: 10.1007/s004040050112.

The problem of relating fetal outcome with breech presentation to mode of delivery

Affiliations

The problem of relating fetal outcome with breech presentation to mode of delivery

T Koike et al. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1996.

Abstract

We retrospectively analyzed 546 consecutive singleton pregnancies with breech presentations that ended at > or = 36 weeks of gestation for the relationship between the intended mode of delivery and fetal outcome. Twelve patients were excluded from the analysis because these infants had major malformations. Of the 534 remaining patients, 124 (23%) were delivered by elective cesarean section. The other 410 women (77%) went into spontaneous labor. Intrapartum emergency cesarean section was required in 112 (27%) of these 410 women; the other 298 (73%) were delivered vaginally. There were 5 poor neonatal outcomes: 3 perinatal deaths and 2 cases of cerebral palsy probably due to intrapartum asphyxia. The risk of poor outcome was thus 1.2% (5/410), in the intended vaginal delivery group vs. no such outcome in the group of 124 patients that had an elective cesarean section. Three of 5 infants with poor outcome were actually born by emergency cesarean section and comparisons of results according to ultimate method of delivery rather than according to intended method of delivery may be misleading and in our case would have been biased against cesarean section.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Mar 15;142(6 Pt 1):643-8 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Jul 15;134(6):615-8 - PubMed
    1. Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Jun;69(6):965-78 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1985 Jun;19(6):391-400 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1973 Feb 15;115(4):497-513 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources