Laparoscopic compared with open appendicectomy for acute appendicitis: a prospective study
- PMID: 8781920
Laparoscopic compared with open appendicectomy for acute appendicitis: a prospective study
Abstract
Objective: To assess the benefits of laparoscopic appendicectomy over open appendicectomy and to evaluate the impact of the severity of appendicitis and of peritonitis on the advantages of the laparoscopic approach.
Design: Prospective unrandomised study.
Setting: University hospital, Italy.
Subjects: 137 consecutive patients with acute appendicitis, 60 of whom were treated by open and 77 by laparoscopic appendicectomy. Patients were subdivided according to the severity of appendicitis and the presence of peritonitis.
Main outcome measures: Duration of operation, consumption of analgesics, duration of hospital stay, overall complications, wound infection.
Results: Hospital stay (median 2.5 days, range 1-18 compared with 4, range 2-22 p < 0.0001). and wound infection (3/77 (4%) compared with 13/60 (22%), p 0.02) were significantly lower after laparoscopic operation. The incidence of wound infection was significantly lower when subgroups were analysed separately.
Conclusions: Hospital stay and wound infection rates were significantly lower after laparoscopic appendicectomy. With the exception of the wound infection rate, the variables studied may differ depending on the severity of the appendicitis and the presence of peritonitis. Result of comparative studies should be carefully interpreted when the two groups are not stratified for these features.
Similar articles
-
Laparoscopic appendicectomy.Eur J Surg. 1993 Apr;159(4):235-7. Eur J Surg. 1993. PMID: 8102545
-
Complicated appendicitis--is the laparoscopic approach appropriate? A comparative study with the open approach: outcome in a community hospital setting.Am Surg. 2007 Aug;73(8):737-41; discussion 741-2. Am Surg. 2007. PMID: 17879676
-
Value of diagnostic laparoscopy in fertile women with suspected appendicitis.Eur J Surg. 1999 Aug;165(8):751-4. doi: 10.1080/11024159950189528. Eur J Surg. 1999. PMID: 10494640
-
[Laparoscopic or open appendectomy. Critical review of the literature and personal experience].G Chir. 2001 Oct;22(10):353-7. G Chir. 2001. PMID: 11816948 Review. Italian.
-
Appendicitis: laparoscopic versus conventional operation: a study and review of the literature.Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997 Dec;7(6):459-63. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1997. PMID: 9438626 Review.
Cited by
-
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 28;11(11):CD001546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30484855 Free PMC article.
-
Appendectomy in the pre- and postlaparoscopic eras.J Gastrointest Surg. 1999 Jan-Feb;3(1):67-73. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(99)80011-0. J Gastrointest Surg. 1999. PMID: 10457327
-
Comparison of outcomes of open and laparoscopic appendectomy: A retrospective cohort study.Health Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 3;6(8):e1483. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1483. eCollection 2023 Aug. Health Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37547357 Free PMC article.
-
Minimally invasive techniques in common surgical procedures: implications for training.Ir J Med Sci. 2003 Jan-Mar;172(1):27-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02914782. Ir J Med Sci. 2003. PMID: 12760460
-
Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy with intracorporal laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy.JSLS. 2001 Jan-Mar;5(1):47-51. JSLS. 2001. PMID: 11303994 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical