Peritoneal dialysis access: prospective randomized comparison of the Swan neck and Tenckhoff catheters
- PMID: 8785234
Peritoneal dialysis access: prospective randomized comparison of the Swan neck and Tenckhoff catheters
Abstract
Objective: To examine the impact of peritoneal catheter configuration on mechanical complications, catheter survival, probability of episodes of peritonitis, and probability of exit-site infections associated with the use of catheters for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD).
Design: Prospective randomized trial.
Setting: CAPD unit in one university hospital, serving a population of 1.2 million.
Patients: Forty consecutive patients requiring their first dialysis catheter for future CAPD were randomized to receive either a two-cuff permanently bent Swan neck catheter or a two-cuff straight Tenckhoff catheter. The skin exit was downward-directed in the Swan neck group and upward-directed in the Tenckhoff group.
Results: Dialysate leak, catheter migration, or tunnel infection did not occur in any of the patients. Three outer cuff extrusions needing cuff shaving occurred, all in the Tenckhoff group (p = 0.1). No significant differences could be demonstrated in catheter survival at 2 years, probability of episodes of peritonitis, or probability of exit-site infections.
Conclusion: Catheter configuration did not influence the catheter-related mechanical or infectious complications, and equally good results were obtained with both catheter types studied.
Comment in
-
Comparisons of the swan neck and Tenckhoff catheters.Perit Dial Int. 1996 Mar-Apr;16(2):189-92. Perit Dial Int. 1996. PMID: 9147561 No abstract available.