Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1996 Mar;70(3):1380-90.
doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79696-0.

Comparative effects of cholesterol and cholesterol sulfate on hydration and ordering of dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine membranes

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparative effects of cholesterol and cholesterol sulfate on hydration and ordering of dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine membranes

C Faure et al. Biophys J. 1996 Mar.

Abstract

The comparative effect of cholesterol (CH) versus cholesterol sulfate (CS) on dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC) membranes has been investigated by optical microscopy, freeze-fracture electron microscopy, x-ray diffraction, and solid state 2H and 31P nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The sulfate analogue extends the lamellar phase domain toward high water contents, and substitution of 30 mol % CH by CS in DMPC lamellae induces the trapping of 30 wt % additional water. The greater swelling of the CS-containing systems is evidenced by determination of lamellar repeat distances at maximal hydration: 147 +/- 4 A and 64 +/- 2 A in the presence of CS and CH, respectively. 2H-NMR of heavy water demonstrates that CS binds approximately 12 more water molecules at the interface than CH whereas NMR of deuterium-labeled DMPC chains reveals that 30 mol % CS orders the membrane as 15 mol % CH at high temperature and disorders much more than CH at low temperatures. The various effects of CS versus CH are discussed by taking into account attractive Van der Waals forces and repulsive steric/electrostatic interactions of the negatively charged sulfate group.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Biochemistry. 1991 Oct 29;30(43):10558-66 - PubMed
    1. Biochemistry. 1990 Nov 27;29(47):10676-84 - PubMed
    1. Biochimie. 1991 Oct;73(10):1295-302 - PubMed
    1. Biochemistry. 1992 Jul 28;31(29):6739-47 - PubMed
    1. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1992 Oct 5;1110(2):225-33 - PubMed

Publication types