Astringent subqualities in acids
- PMID: 8788093
- DOI: 10.1093/chemse/20.6.593
Astringent subqualities in acids
Abstract
Astringency, astringent subqualities (drying, roughing and puckering) and sourness were compared among six acids: hydrochloric, lactic, citric, acetic, fumaric and malic acids. The attribute profiles of organic acids were similar to each other but different from hydrochloric acid, the only inorganic acid, which was the most astringent and the least sour. In a second experiment, two inorganic acids (hydrochloric and phosphoric) and two organic acids (citric and malic) were tested at three concentration levels. At approximately equal levels of overall sensory impact, the inorganic acids were alike in astringency and sourness, receiving higher ratings for roughing and drying, and lower ratings for sourness than the organic acids. Interactions with concentration (differences in psychophysical functions) for the subquality of drying were noted, in addition to the differences in the astringent subqualities of roughing and drying seen across acids in both experiments. The higher level of astringency for inorganic acids suggests that the current model for tannin binding to salivary proteins as an explanation of astringency needs to be extended to include a direct pH-dependent effect.
Similar articles
-
Investigating Mixture Interactions of Astringent Stimuli Using the Isobole Approach.Chem Senses. 2016 Sep;41(7):601-10. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjw064. Epub 2016 Jun 1. Chem Senses. 2016. PMID: 27252355 Free PMC article.
-
Astringency of organic acids is related to pH.Chem Senses. 1996 Aug;21(4):397-403. doi: 10.1093/chemse/21.4.397. Chem Senses. 1996. PMID: 8866103
-
Comparison of the effects of concentration, pH and anion species on astringency and sourness of organic acids.Chem Senses. 1998 Jun;23(3):343-9. doi: 10.1093/chemse/23.3.343. Chem Senses. 1998. PMID: 9669047
-
Mouthfeel subqualities in wines: A current insight on sensory descriptors and physical-chemical markers.Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2023 Jul;22(4):3328-3365. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.13184. Epub 2023 Jun 6. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2023. PMID: 37282812 Review.
-
Astringency and its sub-qualities: a review of astringency mechanisms and methods for measuring saliva lubrication.Chem Senses. 2024 Jan 1;49:bjae016. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjae016. Chem Senses. 2024. PMID: 38591722 Review.
Cited by
-
Check-All-That-Apply (CATA), Sorting, and Polarized Sensory Positioning (PSP) with Astringent Stimuli.Food Qual Prefer. 2015 Oct 1;45:41-49. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.05.004. Food Qual Prefer. 2015. PMID: 26113771 Free PMC article.
-
Performance of an Expert Sensory Panel and Instrumental Measures for Assessing Eating Fruit Quality Attributes in a Pear Breeding Programme.Foods. 2023 Mar 27;12(7):1426. doi: 10.3390/foods12071426. Foods. 2023. PMID: 37048248 Free PMC article.
-
Investigating Mixture Interactions of Astringent Stimuli Using the Isobole Approach.Chem Senses. 2016 Sep;41(7):601-10. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjw064. Epub 2016 Jun 1. Chem Senses. 2016. PMID: 27252355 Free PMC article.
-
Chemical Characterization, Sensory Definition and Prediction Model of the Cider Dryness from New York State Apples.Foods. 2023 May 30;12(11):2191. doi: 10.3390/foods12112191. Foods. 2023. PMID: 37297437 Free PMC article.
-
Sweet Thermal Taste: Perceptual Characteristics in Water and Dependence on TAS1R2/TAS1R3.Chem Senses. 2020 Apr 17;45(3):219-230. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjaa009. Chem Senses. 2020. PMID: 32072157 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources