Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1996 Jan;20(1):28-36.

Cardiovascular risk profile in 38-year and 18-year-old men. Contribution of body fat content and regional fat distribution

Affiliations
  • PMID: 8788319
Comparative Study

Cardiovascular risk profile in 38-year and 18-year-old men. Contribution of body fat content and regional fat distribution

E Bonora et al. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1996 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether young and middle-age men differ in blood pressure and serum lipid profiles and, if so, to what extent these differences are dependent on total body fat, regional fat distribution, plasma insulin and behavioural variables.

Subjects: Random samples of 94 young (18 year-old) and 94 middle-age (38 year-old) healthy men matched for body mass index (BMI).

Measurements: BMI, total body fat (by bioelectrical impedance), regional fat distribution (by anthropometry), serum lipids, blood pressure, fasting insulin and some behavioural variables.

Results: Total body fat was similar in the two groups (mean +/- s.e.: 16.6 +/- 0.5 vs 16.0 +/- 0.6 kg and 20.8 +/- 0.5 vs 20 +/- 0.5%), while waist/hip circumference ratio (WHR) was significantly higher in middle-age as compared to young men (0.96 +/- 0.001 vs 0.92 +/- 0.003, P < 0.0001). The former also had significantly higher serum concentrations of total cholesterol (6.21 +/- 0.13 vs 4.10 +/- 0.10 mmol/l; P < 0.0001). LDL-cholesterol (4.24 +/- 0.11 vs 2.34 +/- 0.10 mmol/l; P < 0.0001), triglycerides 1.40 +/- 0.09 vs 1.02 +/- 0.06 mmol/l; P < 0.01) as well as higher systolic (134.0 +/- 1.6 vs 126.3 +/- 1.4 mmHg; P < 0.0001) and diastolic (86.8 +/- 0.9 vs 82.0 +/- 1.1 mmHg; P < 0.001) blood pressure values. HDL-cholesterol and fasting insulin concentrations were similar in the two groups (1.33 +/- 0.03 vs 1.28 +/- 0.03 mmol/l and 13.7 +/- 0.6 vs 14.7 +/- 0.7 mU/l, respectively). Significant differences in the two groups also were found in daily alcohol consumption (49.6 +/- 5.7 vs 20.0 +/- 3.4 g/day; P < 0.0001), whereas no significant differences were found in smoking and physical activity level. The comparison of subgroups (n = 41) of young and middle-age men matched for both BMI and WHR showed virtually unchanged differences in serum lipids and blood pressure. When age, BMI, WHR, fasting insulin and behavioural variables were included as independent variables in a multiple linear regression analysis in which subjects of the two groups were pooled, age was a significant predictor of total and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides and systolic blood pressure, insulin predicted HDL cholesterol and systolic blood pressure, BMI predicted triglycerides and diastolic blood pressure and WHR was not an independent predictor of any risk factor.

Conclusions: These results indicate that middle-age men have a cardiovascular risk profile less favourable than young men, which is largely independent of differences in total body fat content, regional fat distribution and behavioural variables.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources