Physiological responses to asynchronous and synchronous arm-cranking exercise
- PMID: 8789580
- DOI: 10.1007/BF00964124
Physiological responses to asynchronous and synchronous arm-cranking exercise
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine mechanical efficiency (ME) and physiological responses during asynchronous (the pedal arms oriented in opposing directions) arm-cranking exercise (AACE) and compare these responses to those obtained during synchronous (the pedal arms oriented in the same direction) arm-cranking exercise (SACE). Ten male subjects participated in the study and performed two exercise tests, one AACE and the other SACE in counter-balanced order. Each test consisted of submaximal (30, 60 and 90 W) and maximal exercise. At 30 W, gross ME was significantly lower during SACE compared to AACE, whereas at 60 W and 90 W no differences between the two types of exercise could be observed. We found that at lower power output levels the flywheel mass and its moment of inertia may have induced more body movements for compensation, which may have been more pronounced during SACE than during AACE. At higher levels of power output this flywheel masseffect was less, which explained the lack of differences in ME at these levels. Physiological responses to maximal AACE or SACE exercise were not significantly different. The results indicated that there were no differences in physiological responses to AACE and SACE exercise at higher exercise intensities. However, at lower levels of power output ME seemed to decrease, most likely as a result of the flywheel-mass effect, which was more pronounced during SACE.
Similar articles
-
The effects of arm crank strategy on physiological responses and mechanical efficiency during submaximal exercise.J Sports Sci. 2007 Feb 15;25(4):453-60. doi: 10.1080/02640410600702883. J Sports Sci. 2007. PMID: 17365532
-
Comparison of asynchronous versus synchronous arm crank ergometry.Spinal Cord. 1999 Aug;37(8):569-74. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100875. Spinal Cord. 1999. PMID: 10455533 Clinical Trial.
-
The influence of crank configuration on muscle activity and torque production during arm crank ergometry.J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008 Aug;18(4):598-605. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2006.12.006. Epub 2007 Mar 6. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008. PMID: 17337211
-
Power output and metabolic cost of synchronous and asynchronous submaximal and peak level hand cycling on a motor driven treadmill in able-bodied male subjects.Med Eng Phys. 2008 Jun;30(5):574-80. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.06.006. Epub 2007 Aug 20. Med Eng Phys. 2008. PMID: 17709272 Clinical Trial.
-
On voluntary rhythmic leg movement behaviour and control during pedalling.Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2015 Jun;214 Suppl 702:1-18. doi: 10.1111/apha.12529. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2015. PMID: 26094819 Review.
Cited by
-
The influence of crank length and cadence on mechanical efficiency in hand cycling.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008 Jan;102(2):189-94. doi: 10.1007/s00421-007-0576-7. Epub 2007 Oct 2. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008. PMID: 17909841
-
Biomechanical and physiological differences between synchronous and asynchronous low intensity handcycling during practice-based learning in able-bodied men.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Feb 24;17(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00664-8. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020. PMID: 32093732 Free PMC article.
-
Steering Does Affect Biophysical Responses in Asynchronous, but Not Synchronous Submaximal Handcycle Ergometry in Able-Bodied Men.Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Oct 25;3:741258. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.741258. eCollection 2021. Front Sports Act Living. 2021. PMID: 34761216 Free PMC article.
-
Changing relative crank angle increases the metabolic cost of leg cycling.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017 Oct;117(10):2021-2027. doi: 10.1007/s00421-017-3691-0. Epub 2017 Aug 7. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017. PMID: 28785797
-
Eccentric arm cycling: physiological characteristics and potential applications with healthy populations.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2013 Oct;113(10):2541-52. doi: 10.1007/s00421-013-2687-7. Epub 2013 Jul 10. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2013. PMID: 23838725