Cost of implanting a cemented versus cementless femoral stem
- PMID: 8792242
- DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(96)80025-8
Cost of implanting a cemented versus cementless femoral stem
Abstract
Fifty stratified unselected cases of primary uncomplicated total hip arthroplasty performed at the total joint service of a university teaching hospital were examined. In 25 cases, the femoral stem was implanted with cement, and in the other 25, a cementless stem was implanted. For cemented stems, third-generation cement technique was used, including centrifugation. The average cost to the hospital for a cementless stem was $900 greater than for a cemented stem. The total cost to the hospital for accessories used to achieve modern cement technique was over $700. The operative time for implanting a cemented stem averaged 20 minutes longer, which resulted in an additional operating time charge of $270 and an additional anesthesia charge of $100. When these charges are added to the cost of cement and accessories, the actual cost to the hospital for implanting a modern cemented stem was greater than for a corresponding cementless stem.
Similar articles
-
Cementless femoral prostheses cost more to implant than cemented femoral prostheses.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jun;467(6):1546-51. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0485-z. Epub 2008 Sep 10. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009. PMID: 18781368 Free PMC article.
-
The cost of implanting a cemented versus cementless total knee arthroplasty.Bone Joint J. 2019 Jul;101-B(7_Supple_C):61-63. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B7.BJJ-2018-1470.R1. Bone Joint J. 2019. PMID: 31256655
-
Contemporary total hip arthroplasty with and without cement in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Apr;85(4):675-81. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200304000-00014. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003. PMID: 12672844 Clinical Trial.
-
The cost analysis of cemented versus cementless total hip replacement operations on the NHS.Bone Joint J. 2013 Jul;95-B(7):874-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B7.26931. Bone Joint J. 2013. PMID: 23814235 Review.
-
Cementless versus cemented total hip arthroplasty. A scientific controversy?Orthop Clin North Am. 1993 Oct;24(4):591-7. Orthop Clin North Am. 1993. PMID: 8414424 Review.
Cited by
-
Cemented versus uncemented hip implant fixation: Should there be age thresholds?Bone Joint Res. 2020 Jan 8;8(12):604-607. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.812.BJR-2019-0337. eCollection 2019 Dec. Bone Joint Res. 2020. PMID: 31934332 Free PMC article.
-
Geriatric Femoral Neck Fractures: Hemiarthroplasty Implant Trends Across a Health System From 2006 to 2018.Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2020 Jun 10;11:2151459320927378. doi: 10.1177/2151459320927378. eCollection 2020. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2020. PMID: 32577318 Free PMC article.
-
A Comparative Study on the Outcome of Cemented and Cementless Stems during Total Hip Arthroplasty Conversion in Patients with Failed Osteosynthesis of Proximal Femur Fracture.Hip Pelvis. 2025 Jun 1;37(2):137-144. doi: 10.5371/hp.2025.37.2.137. Hip Pelvis. 2025. PMID: 40432179 Free PMC article.
-
Cementless femoral prostheses cost more to implant than cemented femoral prostheses.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jun;467(6):1546-51. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0485-z. Epub 2008 Sep 10. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009. PMID: 18781368 Free PMC article.
-
The uncemented Bicontact total hip arthroplasty in octogenarians. Medium-term results.Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2002 Dec;12(4):192-7. doi: 10.1007/s00590-002-0054-1. Epub 2002 Dec 18. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2002. PMID: 27476179
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical