Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1977 Jul;67(7):616-20.
doi: 10.2105/ajph.67.7.616.

Very young adolescent women in Georgia: has abortion or contraception lowered their fertility?

Very young adolescent women in Georgia: has abortion or contraception lowered their fertility?

J D Shelton. Am J Public Health. 1977 Jul.

Abstract

Despite a state law enacted in 1972 which allowed minors to obtain contraceptive services without parental consent, births to very young women in Georgia (age 14 and less) have risen in recent years. Beginning in 1974, however, this trend has reversed. Increased access to induced abortion following the 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision appears to have been responsible for the decline. Supporting this assertion are: 1) the temporal relationship between increased access to abortion and the decline in births, 2) the geographic evidence that the decline in births occurred first in Atlanta where abortion utilization is the highest and then followed in areas with somewhat more limited utilization, and 3) a similar observation that the decline occurred earlier and more markedly among young white teenagers whose abortion utilization is higher. Although abortion appears to have had the most visible impact on births, most people would probably agree that efforts toward providing contraception to these young women remain worth the challenge. The ratio of young teenegers accepting contraceptives to young teenegers getting pregnant is suggested as a useful intermediator of the success of family planning programs.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Fam Plann Perspect. 1976 Nov-Dec;8(6):260-2 - PubMed
    1. Fam Plann Perspect. 1976 Jul-Aug;8(4):167-75 - PubMed
    1. Fam Plann Perspect. 1973 Winter;5(1):21-35 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1974 Sep 15;120(2):249-56 - PubMed
    1. Fam Plann Perspect. 1974 Spring;6(2):91-7 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources