Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1996;6(3):334-8.
doi: 10.1007/BF00180604.

Assessment of painful ureterohydronephrosis during pregnancy by MR urography

Affiliations

Assessment of painful ureterohydronephrosis during pregnancy by MR urography

C Roy et al. Eur Radiol. 1996.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the value of the fast imaging sequence called RARE (rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement) MR urography (or RMU) in pregnant women with painful ureterohydronephrosis. A total of 17 pregnant women with an acute flank pain were examined with RMU. Results were compared with those of US, X-rays and the evolution of symptoms. The gold standard techniques used to evaluate the results of MR urography were US when it showed the entire dilated urinary tract and the nature of the obstruction (9 cases), limited intravenous urography (IVU) when performed (3 cases) or endoscopic procedure (5 cases). The accuracy of RMU in the detection of urinary tract dilatation and the localization of the level of obstruction was excellent (sensitivity 100% in our series). The determination of the type of obstruction, intrinsic vs extrinsic, was always exact. The RMU technique alone could not specify the exact nature of the obstruction. The RMU technique is able to differentiate a physiological from a pathological ureterohydronephrosis during pregnancy. It could be considered as the procedure of choice when US failed to establish the differential diagnosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Dec 15;135(8):1066-70 - PubMed
    1. Pediatr Radiol. 1991;21(6):416-20 - PubMed
    1. Radiol Clin North Am. 1991 May;29(3):527-42 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1990 Oct 27;301(6758):944-6 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 1991 Aug;146(2):298-301 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources