Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1996 Jul-Aug;3(4):321-6.
doi: 10.1016/s1071-3581(96)90092-6.

Assessment of the optimal atrioventricular delay in dual chamber-paced patients by a portable scintillation probe (VEST)

Affiliations

Assessment of the optimal atrioventricular delay in dual chamber-paced patients by a portable scintillation probe (VEST)

L Mortelmans et al. J Nucl Cardiol. 1996 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Background: The optimal atrioventricular delay in dual-chamber pacing differs from patient to patient. The availability of a portable scintillation probe (VEST) enables noninvasive monitoring of left ventricular function.

Methods and results: Hemodynamic variations were measured in 10 patients with programmable DDD pacemakers. The ejection fraction, stroke volume, and diastolic and systolic volume were evaluated, programming six different atrioventricular delays ranging from 75 to 200 msec, to determine the most favorable atrioventricular delay. Comparing left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), stroke volume, and end-diastolic and end-systolic volume at each DVI mode with a preceding DVI setting of 75 msec, all parameters at 200 msec were statistically different from those at 100 msec. An increase of LVEF and stroke volume and a decrease of end-systolic volume was found. In only five patients a switch of VVI mode to the optimal DVI mode results in an increase of LVEF of more than 5%.

Conclusions: Our study stresses the importance of optimizing atrioventricular delay. The VEST system permits these measurements, increasing the accuracy of the determination of optimal atrioventricular delay, and appears to be valuable in the management of patients with cardiac dual-chamber pacemakers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1983 Nov;6(6):1350-7 - PubMed
    1. Am Heart J. 1987 Oct;114(4 Pt 1):746-52 - PubMed
    1. J Nucl Med. 1991 May;32(5):796-802 - PubMed
    1. Am Heart J. 1990 Jul;120(1):96-103 - PubMed
    1. Am Heart J. 1979 Dec;98(6):742-51 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources