Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1996 Jul 15;155(2):169-76.

Prevention. How much harm? How much benefit? 3. Physical, psychological and social harm

Affiliations
Review

Prevention. How much harm? How much benefit? 3. Physical, psychological and social harm

K G Marshall. CMAJ. .

Abstract

Harm caused by preventive programs may be physical, psychological, social or, if informed consent has not been obtained, ethical. Adverse effects of preventive screening programs may occur at any of the three levels of the "screening cascade", the screening procedure itself, the investigation of abnormal results of screening tests or the treatment of detected abnormalities or diseases. The greatest harm occurs at the second and third levels. Examples of procedures that may cause physical harm are venipuncture, mammography, colonoscopy, breast biopsy, transrectal ultrasonography, prostate biopsy, weight-reducing and cholesterol-lowering diets and radical prostatectomy. The psychological and social harm of preventive programs involves anticipated discomfort or perception of adverse effects of preventive interventions; unpleasant interactions with health care workers, time required for preventive programs, excessive overall awareness of health, anxiety over the results of a screening test implications of a positive screening test, consequences of being labelled as "sick" or "at risk," psychopathologic effects induced directly by preventive programs and, in the case of a false-negative test result, false assurance of disease-free status. Since the positive predictive value of screening tests in the general population is always low, most abnormal test results are "false-positive," these engender a great deal of psychological discuss among patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1993 May;22(3):338-41 - PubMed
    1. Can Nurse. 1993 Nov;89(10):37-40 - PubMed
    1. Br J Urol. 1993 Nov;72(5 Pt 2):775-7 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1994 Feb 10;330(6):440-1 - PubMed
    1. Br J Urol. 1993 Dec;72(6):977-8 - PubMed