Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1996 Jun;10(2):327-43.
doi: 10.1016/s0891-5520(05)70301-9.

Granulocyte transfusions. Time for a second look

Affiliations
Review

Granulocyte transfusions. Time for a second look

S J Chanock et al. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1996 Jun.

Abstract

Among the available therapies to support neutropenic patients with infection, granulocyte transfusions have generated considerable controversy. Plagued by the inconvenience of harvesting cells, infusion-associated toxicity, and marginal efficacy, granulocyte transfusions, once in vogue in the 1980s, had been relegated to a secondary role. Several recent developments, however, have given new impetus to re-evaluating the role of granulocyte transfusions. The two most notable reasons include the ability to increase the number of circulating granulocytes in the donor by treatment with one or two doses of recombinant hematopoietic growth factors, such as granulocyte- and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor, and improvements in the efficiency of the collection process. Armed with these advances, it is an appropriate time to review the existing data and consider studies designed to determine the appropriate role of granulocyte transfusions in neutropenic hosts.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources