Deprivation payments to general practitioners: limitations of census data
- PMID: 8811761
- PMCID: PMC2351975
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.313.7058.669
Deprivation payments to general practitioners: limitations of census data
Abstract
The census data from which deprivation payments have been calculated since June 1995 suffer from limitations including underenumeration; under counting of homeless people and refugees, and artefactual errors because of the way in which the 1991 census data were tabulated. These limitations reduced the fairness of the changes that many practices experienced in their deprivation payments. The validity of the current system of deprivation payments would be improved if these limitations were borne in mind when allocating payments to practices and if enumeration districts were used as the basis of payments rather than electoral wards.
Comment in
-
Deprivation payments revisited (again).BMJ. 1996 Sep 14;313(7058):641-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7058.641. BMJ. 1996. PMID: 8811749 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Deprivation payments to general practitioners. Scores are calculated relative to national average.BMJ. 1997 Jan 18;314(7075):227-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7075.227a. BMJ. 1997. PMID: 9022466 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Deprivation payments to general practitioners. Standard of service provided by practice should also be taken into account.BMJ. 1997 Jan 18;314(7075):228. BMJ. 1997. PMID: 9022468 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Deprivation payments to general practitioners. Scores should be based on enumeration districts, and payments should be phased in gradually.BMJ. 1997 Jan 18;314(7075):228-9. BMJ. 1997. PMID: 9022469 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources