Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1996 Sep;224(3):372-5; discussion 375-7.
doi: 10.1097/00000658-199609000-00013.

Cultured skin for massive burns. A prospective, controlled trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Cultured skin for massive burns. A prospective, controlled trial

A M Munster. Ann Surg. 1996 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: The author compares the outcome of therapy in patients with massive burns with or without cultured autologous epithelial autografts.

Summary background data: The use of cultured keratinocytes has been controversial because of poor take and fragility. There have been no prospective series comparing the use of this technology with standard burn wound coverage.

Methods: During a 5-year period, 22 patients with an average burn size of 71.8% were treated with cultured keratinocytes and compared with a group of 42 controls with an average burn size of 61.6%.

Results: There was no significant difference in age, sex distribution, or third-degree component of the burn between the two groups. There was a significantly higher incidence of smoke inhalation in the cultured epithelial autograft group. There was a reduction in mortality in the cultured epithelial autograft group compared with controls, from 48% to 14% (p < 0.007). There was no difference between the two groups in other major complications, or in readmission for breakdown.

Conclusions: Coverage of patients who sustain massive burns with cultured autologous epithelial cells is an important and significant advance in management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lancet. 1981 Jan 10;1(8211):75-8 - PubMed
    1. Unfallchirurg. 1995 Apr;98(4):229-32 - PubMed
    1. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1991 Nov-Dec;12(6):533-9 - PubMed
    1. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1991 Nov-Dec;12(6):540-5 - PubMed
    1. Burns. 1991 Dec;17(6):495-8 - PubMed

Publication types